Chakravanti wrote:Potjeh wrote:Claims, sure, impenetrable defences, no.
Please, having someone capable of whacking strong boxes isn't such a ridiculous feat.
Right, how about you shut your piehole and do some math.
Chakravanti wrote:Potjeh wrote:Claims, sure, impenetrable defences, no.
Please, having someone capable of whacking strong boxes isn't such a ridiculous feat.
burgingham wrote:You seem to underestimate certain people...it can be done.
burgingham wrote:It is also much easier to build a multilayer fort for criminals, which is then quite impenetrable, because people would need to build a new ram for each layer. To punish a single criminal you need quite some people to take care of the operation all the time.
burgingham wrote:...
rye130 wrote:
Most criminals are stupid, just find out their timezone build a ram outside their fort, and set a few guys with rangers bows waiting for him to come out and break it.
Return to [ARCHIVE]In Congress Assembled
Users browsing this forum: Claude [Bot] and 1 guest