whiskeypete wrote:Science is borne of hard FACT, repeatable, and predictable.
This whole thread is stupid, but I feel AAmanda's non-answer wasn't very satisfying. Science is
not "hard FACT". If it were hard fact, it wouldn't be science. Science changes as our understanding of the universe does. Scientists will never be able to tell you how something works exactly, they'll only be able to tell you what model agrees with the experimental results, and models are just human concepts used to better-understand reality.
To put it another way, the Greeks once believed that gods were responsible for various natural events, because they didn't, couldn't, understand how they happened. Their models for explaining these things were primitive, but to the average Greek citizen it was 'fact'. Then when along came philosophers and scientists after a long while who challenged those beliefs, we discovered new models and ways of explaining these natural occurrences. To us, now, these explanations are 'fact'. And in two hundred years, men may again challenge our models for understanding and learn even more about these events. To them, it will be 'fact'. To us, it's incomprehensible, and impossible to predict. If science was about hard facts, we'd still believe flies grew out of meat if it set out too long.