Hey guys,
there's this player
and he's butthurt.
TheInternetMan wrote:Yes discussing game mechanics is now "wild ranting". Sorry I wasn't discussing how to harass and raid people's settlements to get my rocks off, I suppose that's the only thing that IRC is for?
TheInternetMan wrote:You guys sure know how to draw in new community members.
"Join a huge village or be raped by a huge village, sorry that's H+H if you don't like it leave"Jackard wrote:lol he brought his wild ranting into IRC and was quickly banned for it. you cant possibly understand the depths of the Internet's anger
Yes discussing game mechanics is now "wild ranting". Sorry I wasn't discussing how to harass and raid people's settlements to get my rocks off, I suppose that's the only thing that IRC is for?
TheInternetMan wrote:sabinati wrote:there isn't a no-pvp option.sabinati wrote:stop posting your ridiculous drivelsabinati wrote:p.s. don't accuse people of making ad hominem arguments when they clearly haven't.sabinati wrote:oh, you're trolling. alright then.
and these aren't all personal attacks how?
Jackard wrote:<TheInternetMan> This kid had to LOOK UP ad hominem
<TheInternetMan> and then have the guile to tell me I didn't know what it meant
<TheInternetMan> aAHAHAAHAHAHA
sabinati wrote:TheInternetMan wrote:sabinati wrote:there isn't a no-pvp option.sabinati wrote:stop posting your ridiculous drivelsabinati wrote:p.s. don't accuse people of making ad hominem arguments when they clearly haven't.sabinati wrote:oh, you're trolling. alright then.
and these aren't all personal attacks how?
here's how:
fact: there isn't a no-pvp option. this has nothing to do with you personally, and effects everyone in the game.
fact: you have posted ridiculous drivel (driv·el/ˈdrivəl/ Noun: Silly nonsense), my favorite so far is this post. i'll be happy to explain further why this is both ridiculous and drivel, but it is in no way a personal attack to say that someone's post is nonsense. calling them a retard is a personal attack.
fact: you are either intentionally misusing "ad hominem", or you don't actually know what it means. again, this is not an attack on your person, but on your logic.
fact: you're using inflammatory rhetoric in order to provoke a reaction. also known as trolling. describing an action that someone is doing is not a personal attack on that person.
sabinati wrote:Jackard wrote:<TheInternetMan> This kid had to LOOK UP ad hominem
<TheInternetMan> and then have the guile to tell me I didn't know what it meant
<TheInternetMan> aAHAHAAHAHAHA
i posted the definition for your benefit, not mine.
p.s. "guile" means intentional deceit, i think the word you are looking for is "gall".
sincerely, sabinati, age 9
TheInternetMan wrote:Fucking pathetic that the mods here troll people.
TheInternetMan wrote:I stopped reading after I cannnot think of an intellectual comeback
Users browsing this forum: Claude [Bot] and 40 guests