LadyV wrote:I know there are those who will disagree with my opinion on this but I think it all boils down to respect. Any term that attacks a person simply for being who they are is derogatory and uncalled for. You can insult people all you wish but there are certain lines where its no longer a condemnation of another's thoughts or actions but an attack on a their existence.
Freedom of speech is fine. Disagreeing with someone is fine. If your so vehemently opposed to someones words or actions you feel the need to insult them fine. But never attack their existence. Like it or not they are still Human and should be treated as such.
Besides there are a huge selection of words that usually far better suite what you intend to imply.
Perfectly said LadyV.

On a side note:
My next door neighbour is 65 years old, she refuses to accept the 'new' meaning of the word gay and uses it quite a bit in conversation. It's not that she doesn't understand the new implications, she just comes from a generation where it was used to express joy and happiness and prefers it that way. I have used the word gay in her presence as it is now commonly used and been severely 'told off' - to her the new use is just as offensive as some of us think 'fgt' is.
I guess at the end of the day it's down to the individual
and an issue of respect. Personally i'd prefer it if no-one used insults, but, we all do from time to time, myself included.

Koru wrote:It is like in Lord of the Flies, nobody controlls what is going on in the hearthlands, those weaker and with conscience are just fucked.
Avatar made by Jordan.Animal lovers - Show us your pets! -
viewtopic.php?f=40&t=44444#p577254