burgingham wrote:It still implies that. Language does not change that fast. It is a cheap excuse to claim that.
The cultural implications of homosexuals being somewhat of a lesser form of human beings is still very much in almost everyones heads. Communication reproduces itself and creates follow up communication. Using the word fag as an insult is part of that.
Edit: Also, the claim that language changes should never be used as a generalized excuse. Changes in languagae should always be supervised by a morel debate on the roots, implications, consequences of something. Going around trying to establish "Heil Hitler" as a casual greeting would never be acceptable and I don't think anyone would argue with that. Same as calling people "Dirty Jews" as an insult. But for homosexuals it is totally ok? No, there are other reasons for this which have their roots in the ever so present discrimination of homsexuals in todays society.
Instead of trying to make "fag" a socially acceptable term one could just as easy not use it as an insult anymore. Why is that so much harder to do than doing the morally questionable thing and then having a big argument about it?
I actually greet some of my friends with "Heil" and sometimes call people jews for too high prices or when something breaks we say "probably jews did this".
But its not like we really mean it, its just for laughs.