Get better macro protection..?

The Place Where Bad Threads Go To Die.

Re: Get better macro protection..?

Postby Atherman » Mon May 24, 2010 2:18 am

"I think I'll create a thread suggesting better macro protection."
"Huh? Why are so many people against macro protection?"
"Oh, they rely on them."
User avatar
Atherman
 
Posts: 113
Joined: Sat May 01, 2010 8:56 am

Re: Get better macro protection..?

Postby Elirian » Mon May 24, 2010 2:22 am

Atherman wrote:"I think I'll create a thread suggesting better macro protection."
"Huh? Why are so many people against macro protection?"
"Oh, they rely on them."


I think a lot of people have posted a lot of other reasons to be against. Valid ones too.
Elirian
 
Posts: 140
Joined: Fri Apr 23, 2010 5:20 pm

Re: Get better macro protection..?

Postby Atherman » Mon May 24, 2010 2:29 am

Elirian wrote:I think a lot of people have posted a lot of other reasons to be against. Valid ones too.




Reasons such as "It would be a waste of time" and "I don't feel like implementing that."
User avatar
Atherman
 
Posts: 113
Joined: Sat May 01, 2010 8:56 am

Re: Get better macro protection..?

Postby Jackard » Mon May 24, 2010 2:33 am

you have your answer already. what are you still doing here, other than throwing a fit
“A designer knows he has achieved perfection not when there is nothing left to add, but when there is nothing left to take away.”
User avatar
Jackard
 
Posts: 8849
Joined: Sun Jul 12, 2009 6:07 am
Location: fucking curios how do they work

Re: Get better macro protection..?

Postby Atherman » Mon May 24, 2010 2:38 am

Talking about the topic at hand. What have you done in this thread besides throw out random not related blurbs of nonsense here and there?


I mean artificially inflating your post count must be nice but not at the cost of sacrificing your integrity.
User avatar
Atherman
 
Posts: 113
Joined: Sat May 01, 2010 8:56 am

Re: Get better macro protection..?

Postby Jackard » Mon May 24, 2010 2:39 am

you realize just how many threads on this subject have been made? you have nothing useful to offer.
“A designer knows he has achieved perfection not when there is nothing left to add, but when there is nothing left to take away.”
User avatar
Jackard
 
Posts: 8849
Joined: Sun Jul 12, 2009 6:07 am
Location: fucking curios how do they work

Re: Get better macro protection..?

Postby Atherman » Mon May 24, 2010 2:40 am

I've yet to see you offer a usual piece of information or insight. Matter of fact all I see you do is blabber against people with personal insults or thoughtless non-responding quotes.




Jackard wrote:
Jackard wrote:Is it that time again already?



Here's your epic contribution to the thread. Thanks for the effort man.
User avatar
Atherman
 
Posts: 113
Joined: Sat May 01, 2010 8:56 am

Re: Get better macro protection..?

Postby Elirian » Mon May 24, 2010 2:42 am

Atherman wrote:
Elirian wrote:I think a lot of people have posted a lot of other reasons to be against. Valid ones too.




Reasons such as "It would be a waste of time" and "I don't feel like implementing that."


No, valid reasons.

Granger for example enjoys metagaming more than gaming. He likes to find out how much he can automate, tinkering with the games systems is more fun to him than the game itself. Free to play games are often a haven for people who enjoy that, as are modding communities.

Jorb is rightfully wary of instituting controls over the players, as such things have a tendency to grow into monstrosities. Each step seems logical and reasonable, until you look back at the path you've taken and where you have ended up.

I think it would be silly to drive away players who are helping you gain information that would be needed in a live situation, although somewhere along the line the question of whether or not to do something about it should probably be addressed.

I think that you generate a lot of ill feeling towards your game if you shanghai people about the legitimacy of taking advantage of the system. You need to be upfront and say bots, macros, exploits of any kind will not be punished, simply because it is counter to expectations, and no one likes nasty surprises. On the flipside, if playing the system is not intended to be a feature, you need to start working out your solutions at some point, even if it's not fun :P
Last edited by Elirian on Mon May 24, 2010 3:28 am, edited 1 time in total.
Elirian
 
Posts: 140
Joined: Fri Apr 23, 2010 5:20 pm

Re: Get better macro protection..?

Postby DatOneGuy » Mon May 24, 2010 2:59 am

You should go back and actually read what jorb wrote. You clearly have problems with reading as all of your posts have indicated repeating what was previously said, misunderstanding what was written, and you (as well as Atherman) continuously posting ideas that are overused, overthought of, and would take even someone with a base IQ of 75 less than a minute of thinking to find out how bad it would be to implement.

Continuing to post in this thread is useless to you, jorb has already posted his views (several times since you didn't catch it the first time) and as it seems is not changing.

As for your 'is it safe or not', how about you read his posts and think it through.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Hi. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
User avatar
DatOneGuy
 
Posts: 5553
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 7:50 am
Location: I'm in Miami, trick.

Re: Get better macro protection..?

Postby Elirian » Mon May 24, 2010 3:02 am

DatOneGuy wrote:You should go back and actually read what jorb wrote. You clearly have problems with reading as all of your posts have indicated repeating what was previously said, misunderstanding what was written, and you (as well as Atherman) continuously posting ideas that are overused, overthought of, and would take even someone with a base IQ of 75 less than a minute of thinking to find out how bad it would be to implement.

Continuing to post in this thread is useless to you, jorb has already posted his views (several times since you didn't catch it the first time) and as it seems is not changing.

As for your 'is it safe or not', how about you read his posts and think it through.


Wondering why I toned it down. Some people go out of their way to earn it.
Elirian
 
Posts: 140
Joined: Fri Apr 23, 2010 5:20 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Hel

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Claude [Bot] and 0 guests