Einlanser wrote:Hahahaha, no. One does not merely 'invent' rights, friend. Rights are afforded either by social contract (Positive Law) or by appealing to some notion of higher good, such as God, or Morality (Natural Law). Your half-baked "Might makes right" sentiments don't hold water in the real world. This is a game, and is removed from the very real and permanent consequences of our lives that make rights a necessity, but you choosing to break into my house because you think you might be able to get away with it places you in every category of wrong conceivable.
My personal beliefs and moral compass don't necessarily mean that I cannot recognize the fact that might is indeed right. You made an assumption about me, an incorrect one at that. I wouldn't break into your house because I find that morally wrong and the idea of doing so is repulsive, even if I could get away with it. In the real world might IS right. The government of your country for example has the might to enforce a way of life and you as a citizen can either live within the guidelines of that system or use your own power to do as you please. It's not a hard concept to understand. Right afforded by social contract can be taken away by those who have the power to do so and the agreements can be broken by the very same. If someone has the power to do as they please then by all means... well.. they can. I can't stop them, can I? Some entity might have the power to, however, and if they take issue and have the power, well... by all means. I can't stop them either.
