Sarvoth wrote:TeckXKnight wrote:
You've yet to make a post where you did not whine and try to play yourself up in this thread. Without exception. Dragoon's post has 0 relevance to my point. Dragoon's ideology is based on extremes and promotes limited interactivity. Essentially, you need to safety proof the internet and the interactions that one may process or dole out. In this case both sides are casting the other in a bad light and flaming began -- he said to knock that off. That's great and has nothing to do with me cutting down your argument unless you make the case that my post is nothing but a flame or a personal attack against you. Go right ahead.
I am a person of limitless patience and your words in this thread have managed to make me seethe. Kudos. I mad.
The discussion went well beyond the context of this specific situation, I said that I didn't know enough about it to bother with it. According to others I'm 'white knighting' and called the OP stupid
Sorry, I actually meant Osium, not the OP. My mistake.
Sarvoth wrote:You would blame me for leaving my gate open and insist that his intentions were pure and I am a douchebag, right? Or would you turn on your friend and tell him he's an idiot and pat me on the back for a job well done?
Lol. This can't be serious. I certainly would not blame the person who left the gate opened, it's just the most nonsensical thing I've ever heard. I seriously don't get why you feel that anyone would do that. I'd certainly demand satisfaction though, but not because it is fair or unfair, but because my friend was hurt and because I can.
Edit:
Anyways, if you haven't yet noticed, it doesn't matter whose fault it is in the end.