Melee or Marksman ?

[Lahrmid]

MM wins by far, i've wasted 85 points in Melee that I've completely given up on.

Takes me a hell of a lot more time to kill a fox with my q120 bronze sword than it does with my q100 sling, and that's only with 30 MM.

[FatBob]

And with UA ?

[Lahrmid]

What the...

How am I supposed to interpret that?


What do you mean by that; "And with UA ?"

Your question is completely out of context.

Do you want a number of UA needed to fight a bloody fox?

[FatBob]

I mean what u thing about UA ?

[Lahrmid]

Ah... Now that's properly rephrased


I think it's shiet compared to MM, but nice compared to melee - quick and easy.

[FatBob]

Okay thx

[Wolfang]

MM wins by far, i've wasted 85 points in Melee that I've completely given up on.

Takes me a hell of a lot more time to kill a fox with my q120 bronze sword than it does with my q100 sling, and that's only with 30 MM.

i'm sure the OP was asking about fighting players, not stupid AI. for hunting itd ALWAYS!! been easier to use MM -.-'

[virus_128]

we can't compare mc and mm. MC is nothing without archer's support, and MM is nothing without Melee support. But yeah, because of update, melee sux now. If you collect 2 iniciative for sting, you get at least 2 arrow in your ass (tested with 200 AU archer, i have 436 melee), and most funny thing, with 436 melee i didn't took his def bar, only 75%. It's very bad.. Melee players have to make 180q+ plates (steel). And i think, raising agi don't help you ( do you want to raise agi to 2300?)