shotgunn902 wrote:Well this threads going nowhere woth phinix tarding it up. Kaizo has probably given you the best advice so far
Awww, lol, Phinix is incredibly endearing.
if you wont a combat tutoral video i can probly make one for you...

shotgunn902 wrote:Well this threads going nowhere woth phinix tarding it up. Kaizo has probably given you the best advice so far
if you wont a combat tutoral video i can probly make one for you...
jordancoles wrote:Basically, shield stance is a way for you to transfer your MC's offensive power into a form of defense. It effectively turns your melee skill into a UA defense by multiplying your MC by 1.25.
If you have 100 mc and are in shield stance it's the same as if you're being hit with 125 ua.
Another reason why MC is used is because of the offensive weights of the moves. Punch is .75 weight, sting is 1.00, and val strike is 1.75 iirc. This means that MC moves will lower your opponents defense bar better than a punch which is the preferred attack for UA users. The up side to MC fighters is that it is much quicker to become competitive in pvp because of how much rings and armor help to increase the stat. On top of this your skill is multiplied by 1.25. The downside to being an MC character is that people who are full UA (the majority of players) will have the advantage of being able to use maneuvers against you, and they will most likely be able to get full benefit from those maneuvers. Since most MC users have low UA and high MC, it means that someone with 2-3 times more UA them are able to get the most out of their maneuvers when using them against the MC character. An example being that Death Or Glory will give them more IP every time you use a move on them and etc. It's not exactly straight fact but maneuver delta depends on your UA vs the opponent's UA. I would say that in order to get full delta on someone you'd need to be about 3x's their UA. As a general rule for an MC character you'll want to have at least 300 UA because otherwise everyone will be able to rape you with their maneuvers, DoG, Bloodlust, Oak stance, all giving full potential to your opponent while you're stuck in shield stance. The reason why I say 300 ua is because 3x's that is 900 which isn't common unless they're in a larger faction. Another reason why it's good to have some UA is that if you're hit outside of shield stance, you'll be hit based on how much UA you have an not based on how much MC defense you have.
Lastly, you will need high strength, a high quality sword, and you will need to be full martial in order to do anything as an MC character. Typical armor class these days is around 1400-1600 so you will need to be able to sting for higher than that in order to do damage to your opponent. Without being full martial you can almost forget about it.
Duhhrail wrote:No matter how fast you think you can beat your meat, Jordancoles lies in the shadows and waits to attack his defenseless prey. (tl;dr) Don't afk and jack off.
jordancoles wrote:jordancoles wrote:Basically, shield stance is a way for you to transfer your MC's offensive power into a form of defense. It effectively turns your melee skill into a UA defense by multiplying your MC by 1.25.
If you have 100 mc and are in shield stance it's the same as if you're being hit with 125 ua.
Another reason why MC is used is because of the offensive weights of the moves. Punch is .75 weight, sting is 1.00, and val strike is 1.75 iirc. This means that MC moves will lower your opponents defense bar better than a punch which is the preferred attack for UA users. The up side to MC fighters is that it is much quicker to become competitive in pvp because of how much rings and armor help to increase the stat. On top of this your skill is multiplied by 1.25. The downside to being an MC character is that people who are full UA (the majority of players) will have the advantage of being able to use maneuvers against you, and they will most likely be able to get full benefit from those maneuvers. Since most MC users have low UA and high MC, it means that someone with 2-3 times more UA them are able to get the most out of their maneuvers when using them against the MC character. An example being that Death Or Glory will give them more IP every time you use a move on them and etc. It's not exactly straight fact but maneuver delta depends on your UA vs the opponent's UA. I would say that in order to get full delta on someone you'd need to be about 3x's their UA. As a general rule for an MC character you'll want to have at least 300 UA because otherwise everyone will be able to rape you with their maneuvers, DoG, Bloodlust, Oak stance, all giving full potential to your opponent while you're stuck in shield stance. The reason why I say 300 ua is because 3x's that is 900 which isn't common unless they're in a larger faction. Another reason why it's good to have some UA is that if you're hit outside of shield stance, you'll be hit based on how much UA you have an not based on how much MC defense you have.
Lastly, you will need high strength, a high quality sword, and you will need to be full martial in order to do anything as an MC character. Typical armor class these days is around 1400-1600 so you will need to be able to sting for higher than that in order to do damage to your opponent. Without being full martial you can almost forget about it.
kaizokuroof wrote: AmAndA, this IZ a COMBAT thrEAD and U clearly KNOE nOTHing
Amanda44 wrote:
Awww, lol, Phinix is incredibly endearing.
Amanda44 wrote:kaizokuroof wrote: AmAndA, this IZ a COMBAT thrEAD and U clearly KNOE nOTHing
Amanda44 wrote:
Awww, lol, Phinix is incredibly endearing.
How does having a soft spot for Phinix = myself claiming combat knowledge?
Lol, you clearly saw the training camp thread.
And anyway, i do have some combat knowledge, i can punch, jump punch, call down the thunder and stab you with my sword.![]()
I can also one shot a deer with my sling and down a bear in three.
DA COmBAT MAstAh
kaizokuroof wrote:
THEN G3T th3 FUX 0UT of TH3 ThR3Ad and baK 2 DA KITcHUN iF u DUn HAv AnYTHAng MEANin6Fool 2 conTrIbuTe. FLURtZ wITz COlz VA Pm N0\/\/Un WA@nTz 2 HEAR UR sHIT.
Amanda44 wrote:kaizokuroof wrote:
THEN G3T th3 FUX 0UT of TH3 ThR3Ad and baK 2 DA KITcHUN iF u DUn HAv AnYTHAng MEANin6Fool 2 conTrIbuTe. FLURtZ wITz COlz VA Pm N0\/\/Un WA@nTz 2 HEAR UR sHIT.
Lol, ok, sticking up for Phinix is not contributing anything meaningful to a thread about combat but i still don't really see how that affects you.
And i honestly can't see how am i flirting with Jordan in this thread.
I'm not really sure tbh what i've done to upset you so much.
borka wrote:Dear Kaizo just a short reminder that we have non english mothertongue users here that depend on using a translator program sometimes - sadly most of them haven't leetspeak or Klingon or newest webspeeks build in yet...
Users browsing this forum: Claude [Bot] and 3 guests