SpineApple wrote:Please clarify what you are specifically warning me for otherwise can I please quote this in a report to the board administrator (did screen shot this just in case).
Jackard wrote:see edit reason in post
SpineApple wrote:I was not trolling you. If you find my opinions in congress not to your liking then it does not mean I am trying to cause you annoyance. If you would have continued, you are using personal anecdotal experience in your own arguments, if my own anecdotal experience wasn't enough for you then something seems very odd from my perspective. Since everyone was being vague and not even attempting to argue against me then why should I elaborate any more? E.G; "Lol GMS!" "Anyone have any good experience with GMS? I don't" This shit is about as good a reply to the thread as mine was later, except you didn't get warned for the same shit.
Jackard wrote:You were arguing a point so fundamentally stupid that no one could truly believe it; therefore you must have been trolling.
SpineApple wrote:TeckX Was the only one who even offered a reply and I read that agreed with most points and then just stopped sharing much thoughts after that. Everything else thereafter was "shitposts" from both greens and black names poking at me, essentially a fucking bandwagon looking for drama baited more replies after that time I just wanted to shut the fuck up. I was getting trolled more than anyone else, go look for yourself. Whether it was intentional or not doesn't bother me, it's that when I ended up feeding trolls I also got a warning for being one. That's fucked.