Lets talk about it honesty.

Forum for discussing in game politics, village relations and matters of justice.

Re: Lets talk about it honesty.

Postby SpiderJerusalem » Tue May 24, 2011 7:54 pm

SpineApple wrote:
Jackard wrote:Can you recall one time where you dealt with GMs that were both competent and fair?

I sure as hell cannot.


Can't recall having problems with GM's at all.

Generally I can play my games and just enjoy them, if people are actually being bothered by GM's they were probably doing something that called for the attention in the first place.


Image
-Bottleneck-
User avatar
SpiderJerusalem
 
Posts: 551
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2011 11:26 pm

Re: Lets talk about it honesty.

Postby SpineApple » Tue May 24, 2011 8:01 pm

SpiderJerusalem wrote:
SpineApple wrote:
Jackard wrote:Can you recall one time where you dealt with GMs that were both competent and fair?

I sure as hell cannot.


Can't recall having problems with GM's at all.

Generally I can play my games and just enjoy them, if people are actually being bothered by GM's they were probably doing something that called for the attention in the first place.


Image


im a rubber, you are glue
Panem et circenses.

11 Minutes of awesome.
User avatar
SpineApple
 
Posts: 111
Joined: Tue May 10, 2011 11:45 pm

Re: Lets talk about it honesty.

Postby Jackard » Tue May 24, 2011 8:04 pm

SpineApple wrote:
Jackard wrote:Can you recall one time where you dealt with GMs that were both competent and fair? I sure as hell cannot.

Can't recall having problems with GM's at all. Generally I can play my games and just enjoy them, if people are actually being bothered by GM's they were probably doing something that called for the attention in the first place.

"GM shenanigans never happened to me, so they must not happen at all. And if they do happen, well I suppose the user must be at fault."
User avatar
Jackard
 
Posts: 8849
Joined: Sun Jul 12, 2009 6:07 am
Location: fucking curios how do they work

Re: Lets talk about it honesty.

Postby SpineApple » Tue May 24, 2011 8:05 pm

Doesn't this apply to your statement too?




USER WAS WARNED FOR THIS POST, BUT TO BE FAIR HE PROBABLY DESERVED IT
Last edited by Jackard on Tue May 24, 2011 8:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: stupid and/or unfunny trolling
User avatar
SpineApple
 
Posts: 111
Joined: Tue May 10, 2011 11:45 pm

Re: Lets talk about it honesty.

Postby SpiderJerusalem » Tue May 24, 2011 8:09 pm

Image


seriously spineapple, stop trolling pls kthx
-Bottleneck-
User avatar
SpiderJerusalem
 
Posts: 551
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2011 11:26 pm

Re: Lets talk about it honesty.

Postby SuchANerd » Tue May 24, 2011 8:12 pm

SpineApple wrote:
Jackard wrote:Can you recall one time where you dealt with GMs that were both competent and fair?

I sure as hell cannot.


Can't recall having problems with GM's at all.

Generally I can play my games and just enjoy them, if people are actually being bothered by GM's they were probably doing something that called for the attention in the first place.


“Unthinking respect for authority is the greatest enemy of truth.”

Albert Einstein
User avatar
SuchANerd
 
Posts: 147
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2011 12:08 am

Re: Lets talk about it honesty.

Postby kohg » Tue May 24, 2011 8:15 pm

Honesty is such a lonely word.
Everyone is so untrue.
Honesty is hardly ever heard.
And mostly what I need from you.
User avatar
kohg
 
Posts: 589
Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2011 2:28 pm

Re: Lets talk about it honesty.

Postby TeckXKnight » Tue May 24, 2011 8:20 pm

I wish I could say that this thread has become very silly but in all truth its just returning to its roots. What a bummer.
User avatar
TeckXKnight
 
Posts: 8274
Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2010 2:31 am
Location: How Do I?

Re: Lets talk about it honesty.

Postby Jackard » Tue May 24, 2011 8:40 pm

SpineApple wrote:Please clarify what you are specifically warning me for otherwise can I please quote this in a report to the board administrator (did screen shot this just in case).
Jackard wrote:see edit reason in post
SpineApple wrote:I was not trolling you. If you find my opinions in congress not to your liking then it does not mean I am trying to cause you annoyance. If you would have continued, you are using personal anecdotal experience in your own arguments, if my own anecdotal experience wasn't enough for you then something seems very odd from my perspective. Since everyone was being vague and not even attempting to argue against me then why should I elaborate any more? E.G; "Lol GMS!" "Anyone have any good experience with GMS? I don't" This shit is about as good a reply to the thread as mine was later, except you didn't get warned for the same shit.
Jackard wrote:You were arguing a point so fundamentally stupid that no one could truly believe it; therefore you must have been trolling.
SpineApple wrote:TeckX Was the only one who even offered a reply and I read that agreed with most points and then just stopped sharing much thoughts after that. Everything else thereafter was "shitposts" from both greens and black names poking at me, essentially a fucking bandwagon looking for drama baited more replies after that time I just wanted to shut the fuck up. I was getting trolled more than anyone else, go look for yourself. Whether it was intentional or not doesn't bother me, it's that when I ended up feeding trolls I also got a warning for being one. That's fucked.
User avatar
Jackard
 
Posts: 8849
Joined: Sun Jul 12, 2009 6:07 am
Location: fucking curios how do they work

Re: Lets talk about it honesty.

Postby SpineApple » Tue May 24, 2011 8:53 pm

Jackard wrote:
SpineApple wrote:Please clarify what you are specifically warning me for otherwise can I please quote this in a report to the board administrator (did screen shot this just in case).
Jackard wrote:see edit reason in post
SpineApple wrote:I was not trolling you. If you find my opinions in congress not to your liking then it does not mean I am trying to cause you annoyance. If you would have continued, you are using personal anecdotal experience in your own arguments, if my own anecdotal experience wasn't enough for you then something seems very odd from my perspective. Since everyone was being vague and not even attempting to argue against me then why should I elaborate any more? E.G; "Lol GMS!" "Anyone have any good experience with GMS? I don't" This shit is about as good a reply to the thread as mine was later, except you didn't get warned for the same shit.
Jackard wrote:You were arguing a point so fundamentally stupid that no one could truly believe it; therefore you must have been trolling.
SpineApple wrote:TeckX Was the only one who even offered a reply and I read that agreed with most points and then just stopped sharing much thoughts after that. Everything else thereafter was "shitposts" from both greens and black names poking at me, essentially a fucking bandwagon looking for drama baited more replies after that time I just wanted to shut the fuck up. I was getting trolled more than anyone else, go look for yourself. Whether it was intentional or not doesn't bother me, it's that when I ended up feeding trolls I also got a warning for being one. That's fucked.


viewtopic.php?f=6&t=6331&start=580

Let's move that there.
Panem et circenses.

11 Minutes of awesome.
User avatar
SpineApple
 
Posts: 111
Joined: Tue May 10, 2011 11:45 pm

PreviousNext

Return to In Congress Assembled

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Claude [Bot] and 0 guests