War between the Panda and the NNN

Forum for discussing in game politics, village relations and matters of justice.

Re: War between the Panda and the NNN

Postby ramones » Fri Aug 26, 2011 10:13 am

Kaze_no_Kamil wrote:I would disagree with the consumption of attempt summon even when failed but right now though I think we need devs to take a look at this matter as this is getting critical. I fear an exodus from this game.


Game was broken first day that group started to play and use walljumps, CS jumps and bots in a battle way as this summoner one is. And it is definately something devs should take a look at, now that we got proofs that they are abusing it. W4 repeats I'm afraid.

Oh and not just they are using it, they will deny it ofc till they get smacked by jorb I hope :D
W8 - Hermitage
W7 - Emerald City
W6 - Gomorrah
W5 - Pandemonium
W4 - Angkor
W3 - Angkor
User avatar
ramones
 
Posts: 3053
Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2010 10:03 pm
Location: I am a man who walks alone'

Re: War between the Panda and the NNN

Postby Qant » Fri Aug 26, 2011 10:13 am

Patchouli_Knowledge wrote:This is what I am most afraid of now. This is no longer a game.

You know why it is so? Because they are making new rules about what is abuse on the spot.
We use vaults - we are abusing game mechanics. Guys like Nao using vaults - are totally fine.
They use charterstones to jump to our rams - that is alll cool, we do the same - we are abusing.
We use unboxed rams to break their walls due to their failures in patrolling thier walls - we are abusing again.
We use scents to summon guys without HF - right, we are abusing again, because there is no way we can legitimately summon anyone of them, because they are too cool for that.
You see the trend? Right now if I ll go outside to pick a branch from the tree they will call it abusing anyway.
Qant
 
Posts: 77
Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2010 4:15 pm

Re: War between the Panda and the NNN

Postby LadyGoo » Fri Aug 26, 2011 10:14 am

Kaze_no_Kamil wrote:I would disagree with the consumption of attempt summon even when failed but right now though I think we need devs to take a look at this matter as this is getting critical. I fear an exodus from this game.
Want fix something? Use it on ex-sodomits. (c) russian community saying
Why don't u think the mineholes should be fixed? They' aren't less critical.
Hafen Helpdesk Skype Conference [Eng]: https://join.skype.com/mxo3yVNbrCK9
Справочная Конференция [Ru]: https://join.skype.com/fnAcsc0srDBN

Trade Conference [Eng-Ru]: https://join.skype.com/gNT6Rs92PTtM

W10 Queen of Dis fiancée of Leanne69 (Lolo)
W9 Hive [Ruler]
W8 Dis [Chieftain]
W7 Ofir [Lawspeaker]
W6 Dis [Chieftain] & Disneyland
W5 Vitterstad [Lawspeaker]
W4 A.D. [Fighter]
W3 Garden of Metallurgists [LS]
User avatar
LadyGoo
 
Posts: 2767
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2011 9:06 am

Re: War between the Panda and the NNN

Postby ramones » Fri Aug 26, 2011 10:16 am

LadyGoo wrote:
Kaze_no_Kamil wrote:I would disagree with the consumption of attempt summon even when failed but right now though I think we need devs to take a look at this matter as this is getting critical. I fear an exodus from this game.
Want fix something? Use it on ex-sodomits. (c) russian community saying
Why don't u think the mineholes should be fixed? They' aren't less critical.


Stop bullshiting already.

Sodomites (ex or not) war playing fun game, while you used 15x jumps to raid random people, which you said you don't raid. Another lie.

Minehols are bugged and no one aruond to fix it or half of your army hiding in them when running away would be 6ft under already including Bell. (3x).

And about summoning, no one said R-Maffia wasn't the one who summoned, after all, he is a bot at that point, doh.
W8 - Hermitage
W7 - Emerald City
W6 - Gomorrah
W5 - Pandemonium
W4 - Angkor
W3 - Angkor
User avatar
ramones
 
Posts: 3053
Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2010 10:03 pm
Location: I am a man who walks alone'

Re: War between the Panda and the NNN

Postby Tonkyhonk » Fri Aug 26, 2011 10:18 am

oh just admit, you guys didnt wanna go out to fight when you had 10 people on, but instead chose to spam-summon. right?
User avatar
Tonkyhonk
 
Posts: 4501
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2010 6:43 am

Re: War between the Panda and the NNN

Postby burgingham » Fri Aug 26, 2011 10:20 am

Unbelievable that you are even trying to defend yourself with such lame ass shit. We never used vaults, we never jumped any wall in the first place. You did and at some point there is only one way to put up with this if I want to defend my town.

Anybody believing those half-assed lies coming out of your mouth must have half a brain. I am as usual too trusting to understand that. People like Sabinati, Avu, Potjeh quit a long time ago. Asking me: Why do you even put up with those lying cheats abusing the fuck out of this game?

I tried to protect Pandemonium, because it is full of nice players who just want to play this game in peace and are ready to defend themselves with honor if necessary. Have you seen those 30 people armies at your doors every day now? You are 5-8 guys and yet I cannot stand a chance against you. I have PvPers who laugh at your skills when they are able to catch you outside of your vaults for a change. I even tried to get to some agreements to get a fair fight. But the first rule of that agreement should have been: No hearthvaults. Even then you would have found another way to abuse the shit out of the game.

Your excuses and arguments are cynic btw. It is disgusting.
User avatar
burgingham
 
Posts: 8486
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2009 10:58 pm

Re: War between the Panda and the NNN

Postby ramones » Fri Aug 26, 2011 10:20 am

They only can punch jump, so they cannot win 5 vs 11 (as many they were in cellar when they summoned).
W8 - Hermitage
W7 - Emerald City
W6 - Gomorrah
W5 - Pandemonium
W4 - Angkor
W3 - Angkor
User avatar
ramones
 
Posts: 3053
Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2010 10:03 pm
Location: I am a man who walks alone'

Re: War between the Panda and the NNN

Postby Russian_Mafia » Fri Aug 26, 2011 10:20 am

I use a client from Ender's where you can not use a bot
Image
User avatar
Russian_Mafia
 
Posts: 78
Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2011 12:27 pm
Location: Dis

Re: War between the Panda and the NNN

Postby Qant » Fri Aug 26, 2011 10:20 am

Tonkyhonk wrote:oh just admit, you guys didnt wanna go out to fight when you had 10 people on, but instead chose to spam-summon. right?

Say again, why we should fight 12 vs 25?
Qant
 
Posts: 77
Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2010 4:15 pm

Re: War between the Panda and the NNN

Postby Kaze_no_Kamil » Fri Aug 26, 2011 10:21 am

My village were the first to discover how mine-holes can be abused before Pandemonium, whom we have essentially no political association with, and we wanted the problem to be eliminated to prevent abuse but from what I am reading here, it looks as if they were using brickwalls (wasn't there an agreement between you two?). We try to discover every broken mechanism and do away with it. What I fear right now is the usage of other broken and unfixed mechanism that is driving people from the game.
Image
An enemy will only fight if he believes he either has a chance to win, or you've backed him into a corner and he's fighting for his life. A completely crushing victory provides an enemy with neither.
Kaze_no_Kamil
 
Posts: 100
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2011 5:54 am
Location: Gensokyo

PreviousNext

Return to In Congress Assembled

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Claude [Bot] and 0 guests