Setting wrote:I am that guy pr0 nao...any problem?? Come with me....=)=)!!
Setting wrote:
Peace, fun and weed!
Cajoes wrote:I was the murder victim your guy aggro'd. And slew. Entirely unprovoked. Rather handily at that. Which prompted the retaliatory party. That you also handily slew.
Elaes wrote:even a braindead monkey know that in our current world we have only villainous large factions if you wanna consider it, is nothing new, and is even more common to explain facts, from your view in a thread (notice the pattern of previous post of nao with "they attacked me in 5v1 ! i killed 2 ! im a hero! ) or dis with "we raided the evil heartvault place of xxxx people". Sure everybody has his reason to think to be right : aracos love to try to act as a white knight but since the game (and this has been stated more then 1 time) push you to get advantage over the weakest target (or act in a suitable situation), it's simply pure hypocrisy we dont deny it.
If you attack a better group and fail your a noob, if you succeed then your a good player if you give them loss they rage.
mainly those post in congress are just for the lulz / give information to the player base about what's going on outside their village, and spoil a bit of the "current alliances in progress" in each world. Here you see that Winterfell tought to be in an alliance with RiC, found out that instead was just a "not aggressive pact", and in the end found out ainran is in total alliance with RiC and not just having a "not aggressive pact with them", enough to let them use crossroad to move in differents RiC outposts (and honestly i can even understood that koru had to think : yeye screw aracos and his lil gimpy town, i've ainran on my side, im safe and i will have no problem with him or anybody else).
Elaes wrote:p.s. im sure i dont have to explain to a player like you stuff like that, but then your post was just usefull as a second asshole on the right elbow
bmjclark wrote:Everyone knows wicker basket signs full of boughs = bug jump
Cajoes wrote:I was the murder victim your guy aggro'd. And slew. Entirely unprovoked. Rather handily at that. Which prompted the retaliatory party. That you also handily slew.
Kaios wrote:Elaes wrote:even a braindead monkey know that in our current world we have only villainous large factions if you wanna consider it, is nothing new, and is even more common to explain facts, from your view in a thread (notice the pattern of previous post of nao with "they attacked me in 5v1 ! i killed 2 ! im a hero! ) or dis with "we raided the evil heartvault place of xxxx people". Sure everybody has his reason to think to be right : aracos love to try to act as a white knight but since the game (and this has been stated more then 1 time) push you to get advantage over the weakest target (or act in a suitable situation), it's simply pure hypocrisy we dont deny it.
If you attack a better group and fail your a noob, if you succeed then your a good player if you give them loss they rage.
mainly those post in congress are just for the lulz / give information to the player base about what's going on outside their village, and spoil a bit of the "current alliances in progress" in each world. Here you see that Winterfell tought to be in an alliance with RiC, found out that instead was just a "not aggressive pact", and in the end found out ainran is in total alliance with RiC and not just having a "not aggressive pact with them", enough to let them use crossroad to move in differents RiC outposts (and honestly i can even understood that koru had to think : yeye screw aracos and his lil gimpy town, i've ainran on my side, im safe and i will have no problem with him or anybody else).
Man, you completely overreacted to my post. I was implying exactly what you said. In past worlds Aracos has been the "white knight" type player like you said, and even refused to go on raids that involved bug using. I'm not saying you guys are using bugs now, only some abuse of poor siege mechanics, but to act so cocky isn't going unnoticed by anyone.Elaes wrote:p.s. im sure i dont have to explain to a player like you stuff like that, but then your post was just usefull as a second asshole on the right elbow
None of your posts have been any more useful than mine, just more shit in a toilet thread.
Kaios wrote:Elaes wrote:p.s. im sure i dont have to explain to a player like you stuff like that, but then your post was just usefull as a second asshole on the right elbow
None of your posts have been any more useful than mine, just more shit in a toilet thread.