Not sure if legal

Forum for discussing in game politics, village relations and matters of justice.

Re: Not sure if legal

Postby fallout » Wed Nov 02, 2011 12:55 am

iirc, jorb nuked a palisade hearth vault before, so I am sure he would do this too. so your only problem is getting him on to do it.
User avatar
fallout
 
Posts: 885
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 3:17 am

Re: Not sure if legal

Postby Chakravanti » Wed Nov 02, 2011 1:12 am

fallout wrote:iirc, jorb nuked a palisade hearth vault before, so I am sure he would do this too. so your only problem is getting him on to do it.

Never mind the consensus amount the vets. Listen to this guy who didn't even read the thread and makes up references to events without providing evidence for behavior counter to the development team's stated intervention philosophies.
Well what is this that I can't see
With ice cold hands takin' hold of me
Well I am death, none can excel
-Ralph Stanley, O Death!
User avatar
Chakravanti
 
Posts: 3345
Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2009 3:38 am

Re: Not sure if legal

Postby painhertz » Wed Nov 02, 2011 1:15 am

Essentialism wrote:I've been spamming le door for 5 min, no way to get in without destroying the house or claim.


The house is as destroyable as a palisade. There's nothing illegal there.
"I shall PERSONALLY witness for you at the shiny, chrome gates of Valhalla!"
User avatar
painhertz
 
Posts: 6185
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2011 2:07 am
Location: Louisiana

Re: Not sure if legal

Postby MagicManICT » Wed Nov 02, 2011 1:55 am

Essentialism wrote:I've been spamming le door for 5 min, no way to get in without destroying the house or claim.


Umm.. yeah, good luck with that. The sprint off thing usually only works when you're actually stuck on something. It might work for getting in doors, but I've never bothered trying.

painhertz wrote:The house is as destroyable as a palisade. There's nothing illegal there.


Yup.

From RoB:

Soak Value 25
Opinions expressed in this statement are the authors alone and in no way reflect on the game development values of the actual developers.
User avatar
MagicManICT
 
Posts: 18435
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2010 1:47 am

Re: Not sure if legal

Postby fallout » Wed Nov 02, 2011 2:03 am

Chakravanti wrote:
fallout wrote:iirc, jorb nuked a palisade hearth vault before, so I am sure he would do this too. so your only problem is getting him on to do it.

Never mind the consensus amount the vets. Listen to this guy who didn't even read the thread and makes up references to events without providing evidence for behavior counter to the development team's stated intervention philosophies.

Chak being Chak, I did read the thread, what more could I have added to this useless thing?
User avatar
fallout
 
Posts: 885
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 3:17 am

Re: Not sure if legal

Postby ImAwesome » Wed Nov 02, 2011 3:00 am

theres a hf in front of cave entrance, you're all just assuming hfs are inside house...

even if there is a hf inside the person it belongs to is trapped in there...thread result: new way to grief, alt claim in front of someone's unclaimed house
ImAwesome
 
Posts: 739
Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2011 4:35 pm

Re: Not sure if legal

Postby TeckXKnight » Wed Nov 02, 2011 3:08 am

ImAwesome wrote:theres a hf in front of cave entrance, you're all just assuming hfs are inside house...

even if there is a hf inside the person it belongs to is trapped in there...thread result: new way to grief, alt claim in front of someone's unclaimed house

Ya, I gave that some thought too. I was thinking they likely did that to hide the character in there until the scents decayed then they could declaim and re-set their claim to a more convenient location. While they're waiting for the scents to decay they're likely on an alt.

Though you're correct that you could probably grief a newbie like this too.
User avatar
TeckXKnight
 
Posts: 8274
Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2010 2:31 am
Location: How Do I?

Re: Not sure if legal

Postby Chakravanti » Wed Nov 02, 2011 3:37 am

fallout wrote:
Chakravanti wrote:
fallout wrote:iirc, jorb nuked a palisade hearth vault before, so I am sure he would do this too. so your only problem is getting him on to do it.

Never mind the consensus amount the vets. Listen to this guy who didn't even read the thread and makes up references to events without providing evidence for behavior counter to the development team's stated intervention philosophies.

Chak being Chak, I did read the thread, what more could I have added to this useless thing?

Oh, are we done being sarcastic now? We were doing so well. What happened, bro?
Well what is this that I can't see
With ice cold hands takin' hold of me
Well I am death, none can excel
-Ralph Stanley, O Death!
User avatar
Chakravanti
 
Posts: 3345
Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2009 3:38 am

Re: Not sure if legal

Postby Phaen » Wed Nov 02, 2011 6:59 am

ImAwesome wrote:theres a hf in front of cave entrance, you're all just assuming hfs are inside house...

even if there is a hf inside the person it belongs to is trapped in there...thread result: new way to grief, alt claim in front of someone's unclaimed house

If that stake disallows exiting and the victim is trapped in with his HF... damn... that means not even a remote village invite could save them since it can't be done when people are inside.
Image
User avatar
Phaen
 
Posts: 995
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2011 2:17 am

Re: Not sure if legal

Postby killette2 » Wed Nov 02, 2011 1:48 pm

Phaen wrote:
ImAwesome wrote:theres a hf in front of cave entrance, you're all just assuming hfs are inside house...

even if there is a hf inside the person it belongs to is trapped in there...thread result: new way to grief, alt claim in front of someone's unclaimed house

If that stake disallows exiting and the victim is trapped in with his HF... damn... that means not even a remote village invite could save them since it can't be done when people are inside.


They would just take the stake down and rebuild it.
killette2
 
Posts: 409
Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2011 1:11 am

PreviousNext

Return to In Congress Assembled

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Claude [Bot] and 0 guests