Wolfang wrote:When did I ever imply this?
Wolfang wrote:Never at any moment did I encounter any hostile individuals during my hunting trips. I can 100% guarantee that many people who lived in the SG can back this statement.
burgingham wrote:You don't understand at all what I mean when I am distinguishing out of game and in game.
Wolfang wrote:-
Tbh, the 'out of game' vets are the ones who helped build the game up to what it is now. It's no wonder so many of them are moderators.
Being ex players doesn't mean we don't want to play, we just want the game to not be broken, arguing the game isn't broken right now is ridiculous.
btaylor wrote:I have learned that the game doesn't follow the principles of mathematics. If you want something and the game is in a good mood you can get it, whatever it is. More often than not, however, the game wants you to die.
Discussed this idea with our ls. He suggested the central supergrid and discuss this further with other factions. Valten21 also has shown his interest in it. Probably, it's proper to do a skype conference with faction leaders and form this idea to something which might exist.Koru wrote: I support making one supergrid free of any violent acts where newbie players can learn how to play.
LadyGoo wrote:Discussed this idea with our ls. He suggested the central supergrid and discuss this further with other factions. Valten21 also has shown his interest in it. Probably, it's proper to do a skype conference with faction leaders and form this idea to something which might exist.Koru wrote: I support making one supergrid free of any violent acts where newbie players can learn how to play.
Ah, we might just be rangers in this area hunting crminal scums if someone will complaint.painhertz wrote: Cute idea but unaffiliated raiders would take that as a "happy hunting ground".
Return to In Congress Assembled
Users browsing this forum: Barkrowler [Bot], Claude [Bot] and 0 guests