A Strive For A Better Commonwealth

Forum for discussing in game politics, village relations and matters of justice.

Re: A Strive For A Better Commonwealth

Postby NaoWhut » Fri Aug 17, 2012 10:35 pm

Wasn't the plan of the Crusades more similar
to the situation of Ainran?

Crusaders were a load of warriors that ate,
slept, and breathed war, knew how to fight
very very well and longed for glory.... so to
get them the heck out of the peaceful places
in europe the pope declared Crusades for
glory and God where Crusaders would leave
for war and no longer be the equivalent of
Ainran sitting around a group of peacefull
farmers.

You don't need the world's greatest killers in
a time of peace when all they want is to do
what they do best, they're actually dangerous
to you.
ImageImage
User avatar
NaoWhut
 
Posts: 4852
Joined: Sun Aug 30, 2009 11:55 pm
Location: |.

Re: A Strive For A Better Commonwealth

Postby ApocalypsePlease » Fri Aug 17, 2012 10:42 pm

LostJustice wrote:I am just trying to make a better community.

You know recently on the Salem wiki, there were some arguments going on because someone tried to put themselves in a position of power and essentially suppressed anyone being able to do anything about it, claiming it was in the better interest of the community.

You are trying to set standards for the way people behave. You can't do that in a game like this where nobody has any reason to follow you. People have issues with what you've said, because they don't agree with it.

You cannot keep dismissing what people say with the reason that they "didn't read it", because perhaps you've been too ambiguous in your writing that what we've read isn't what you intended, maybe not stressing key points but instead having them sewn in in such a way that they aren't recognized as significant.

I'm going to say this from personal experience: as much as you wish and want and push and try to make something true, there are things which you can't do alone, and I see your mistake coming from that. Instead of making compromises, you're not letting it waver from your perfect envisionment in your head. The second you can accept in your mind that nobody being perfect includes you, you can set yourself free.
Inactive
User avatar
ApocalypsePlease
 
Posts: 1164
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2011 12:52 am

Re: A Strive For A Better Commonwealth

Postby jordancoles » Fri Aug 17, 2012 11:19 pm

The point of the game is to be a social experiment. Unless you have a reason for why you should be the head of this idea then there's no reason for anyone to listen to you. Dis enforced the peacegrid for a while but it was maintained through violence. I do sort of agree with the 1v1 thing about random agro/killing though, agreeing to the fight or disagreeing would add a little more civility to the outdoors but again it's all up the the general player-base.

Also lol, didn't read 90% of that
Duhhrail wrote:No matter how fast you think you can beat your meat, Jordancoles lies in the shadows and waits to attack his defenseless prey. (tl;dr) Don't afk and jack off. :lol:

Check out my pro-tips thread
Image Image Image
User avatar
jordancoles
 
Posts: 14076
Joined: Sun May 29, 2011 6:50 pm
Location: British Columbia, Canada

Re: A Strive For A Better Commonwealth

Postby factnfiction101 » Fri Aug 17, 2012 11:25 pm

All i got from this thread is that LadyGoo dresses up like a wolf and kills sheep IRL, can i have pics of this plz?
User avatar
factnfiction101
 
Posts: 304
Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2012 6:22 am

Re: A Strive For A Better Commonwealth

Postby Swarm » Sat Aug 18, 2012 11:41 am

LostJustice wrote:Obviously you did not read. Neither did the above poster read either, reason why I posted that. So next time read before you make assumptions. In no way does this change Haven and Hearth to No Combat.


It seems your reading comprehension is a bit off, or you're just pretending it is because your ideas aren't being perceived as you expected they would. You should know my previous post was referring to the "family friendly" game aspect you're trying to enforce and not PVP alone, you want to turn a NSFW game into something that it's not.
"baww they're drawing profanities, I don't like them so you should all go and destroy them for me, it's a right thing to do, my dad and the bible say so, bawwww"

Newsflash;
This is the image jorb&loftar used as an official H&H poster
Image
Swastikas, dicks, no censure regarding words such as "NIGGER" + the allowance to be an ass toward people for no reason are the essence of Haven.
User avatar
Swarm
 
Posts: 359
Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2011 9:21 am

Re: A Strive For A Better Commonwealth

Postby popfor » Sat Aug 18, 2012 3:16 pm

Swarm wrote:
LostJustice wrote:Obviously you did not read. Neither did the above poster read either, reason why I posted that. So next time read before you make assumptions. In no way does this change Haven and Hearth to No Combat.


It seems your reading comprehension is a bit off, or you're just pretending it is because your ideas aren't being perceived as you expected they would. You should know my previous post was referring to the "family friendly" game aspect you're trying to enforce and not PVP alone, you want to turn a NSFW game into something that it's not.
"baww they're drawing profanities, I don't like them so you should all go and destroy them for me, it's a right thing to do, my dad and the bible say so, bawwww"

Newsflash;
This is the image jorb&loftar used as an official H&H poster
Image
Swastikas, dicks, no censure regarding words such as "NIGGER" + the allowance to be an ass toward people for no reason are the essence of Haven.

I can call everyone on these forums and gay little nigger faggot and in the end its up to the (9?) mods of the forums to dictate it, yes, dictate, It is 100% up to them what is acceptable and what isn't. Not even jorb and loftar, their off playing their deformed baby. I can say deformed baby due to free speech. If the mods ban me for this is completely up to them and their personalities, i've seen worse on here :roll:
Image Image
my avatar is stolen without permission
Image
#badboysclub
User avatar
popfor
 
Posts: 1406
Joined: Sat Dec 25, 2010 2:14 am
Location: E̹̙̺̬̖͈̘̭̙̘̔̈́̍͆͌̋̊̈́̀̎d̡̨̺̠̠̜̲̹͕̯̑̀͂͂̈̇̿̏͝͝g̨̙̻̼͎͖̱͔̗͙̐̅̇͗̈́̔͛̌̌͠ŷ͔̼͓̺̮̪̫̙̬̐͊̀́̊͆͝͝͝ͅ

Re: A Strive For A Better Commonwealth

Postby Projeear » Sat Aug 18, 2012 4:22 pm

popfor wrote:I can call everyone on these forums and gay little nigger faggot and in the end its up to the (9?) mods of the forums to dictate it, yes, dictate, It is 100% up to them what is acceptable and what isn't. Not even jorb and loftar, their off playing their deformed baby. I can say deformed baby due to free speech. If the mods ban me for this is completely up to them and their personalities, i've seen worse on here :roll:


+1.
Grand Walker of World 1 (w1).
Ex-Lawspeaker of New London, Deadwood and New Deadwood (w3).
Witness of the World 4 Great Explosion (w4).
Ex-Lawspeaker of Gregminster (w5).
Ex-Lawspeaker of Laketown (w6).
Squatter and Rebuilder of Templus Pacis (w6).
Hermit thereafter.
Lawspeaker of Tachbrookshire (Hafen 2)
User avatar
Projeear
 
Posts: 950
Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2011 2:02 am
Location: Jolly ol' England

Previous

Return to In Congress Assembled

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Claude [Bot] and 0 guests