Top Traders (measured by feedback)

[ramones]

Ye as said, its only positive and not negative what you did, so good work.

Most of my trades that I do are very simple and fast, since 10-20 people I regulary provide with certain type of materials just send me msg "this" and get it in next minute (if on stock), so really hassling with forum would be too much

Probably 10-15 trades is what I had in average per day, now its bit lower since I am not online that much, so I'd say 8-10/day

[bogbrush]

well, your post is the most viewed on trades, so that could be an indicator too, i am sure your custom will not suffer because Nine dragons has more feedback.

[ramones]

Nah, my trades are so I don't need to cover 50% of playing time for gathering things I get from them, and that purpose only. Nothing to do with popularity, I did that in w3 to became bit more known that I was and I believe I succeeded at that point. Ofc, behind me there are many people that made it possible for me, so I don't give credit only to myself But I feed their mouth, so they are happy

[bogbrush]

unfortunately, i am calling a halt to updating this thread, because there appears to be a sudden rise in the number of 'new player' and/or village friend 'great trader!' posts.
although i cannot prove this, i am suspicious, and do not want to throw off my original results because of possible false data, but i will re-emphasis that all traders mentioned on the original post have had no negative feedback, and as far as i am aware can be trusted.

my original post is accurate as of 07 march 2012 (12:15 UTC)

[ramones]

Your assumptions are correct, allies posting good thread words all the time

[_Gunnar]

unfortunately, i am calling a halt to updating this thread, because there appears to be a sudden rise in the number of 'new player' and/or village friend 'great trader!' posts.
although i cannot prove this, i am suspicious, and do not want to throw off my original results because of possible false data, but i will re-emphasis that all traders mentioned on the original post have had no negative feedback, and as far as i am aware can be trusted.

my original post is accurate as of 07 march 2012 (12:15 UTC)

yeah, this was a very nice thread and good work, but as soon as it was done it was doomed to be abused :p.

And really all people should be looking at is the quality+price of the goods, as well as the affiliation of the trader if that sort of thing bothers them. Top 2 are no surprise at all. I am a bit surprised bell is so far lower than those 2, but this could be due to language barrier. No offense to you and Winterfell, you've just been around much shorter time

[Aracos]

Time dsnt matter, we offer same qualities in lower prices.

[ramones]

Which is wrong, but you wouldn't understand that.

[_Gunnar]

Time dsnt matter, we offer same qualities in lower prices.

You misunderstood me, I am saying that since you have been around shorter time its surprising that you have more positive comments already, and i expect this is because of language barrier for Bell. Yes your trade topic is very nice

And ramones, its a free market. If they can provide it for cheaper, good for them.

[ramones]

It is, but that is showing no respect to other traders who keep "general" prices at its level. I have as much of certain things that I can put them much lower than anyone, but what would I achieve with that? They would just go lower again and at the end gold nug would be 30 points. That seems reasonable?

Prices should be kept at same level for everyone.