CAVEAT EMPTOR: Regarding Real Money Transactions

[burgingham]

I should not have prolongued the ban without waiting for the discussion over the initial ban though.

[cobaltjones]

Now to make jorb make a statement on all the other crap too.

I'd rather Salem get finished sometime in the next 12 months honestly.

[Wolfang]

Got offered big bucks for my account a while back.

[burgingham]

QQ and my mod account nobody wanted to buy.

[Patchouli_Knowledge]

Real cohesive administrative unit we've got here. Just keep undercutting each other's authority. Make you all look real competent.

Being a machine is required to be part of the administrative unit?

[Wolfang]

Hallo Wolf. I need in account. If you want to buy, please say me. I paing for good accaunt 100-200$

[TheTylerLee]

he would of disputed the payment

[cobaltjones]

Real cohesive administrative unit we've got here. Just keep undercutting each other's authority. Make you all look real competent.

Being a machine is required to be part of the administrative unit?

What? I'm just saying it makes the moderators look bad when one guy is banning someone and then a couple minutes later another mod goes "don't really understand why he was banned" and then later the ban is overturned. Usually stuff like that is discussed behind the scenes before such decisions are made. "Cohesive" just means that they should be working together, or at least give that outward appearance. When you've got one guy saying one thing and another guy saying something completely different it kind of undermines the authority of the group.

[burgingham]

I actually agree with you there and have argued the same way behind the scenes.

[jorb]

I quite like that they feel that they can make independent judgments. If that means that those decisions are sometimes overturned then I'm fine with that. I don't think of them as an "administrative unit", but as knights of my round table. Again, this, and how it isn't a democracy &c&c.