obviously its circumstantial evidence at best but its not worth dying over. if you're suspicious, dont test your luck... a lesson which i learnt earlier this world

_Gunnar wrote:i dont know either lol but i've only ever seen it on ad people :p
obviously its circumstantial evidence at best but its not worth dying over. if you're suspicious, dont test your luck... a lesson which i learnt earlier this world
Amanda44 wrote:_Gunnar wrote:i dont know either lol but i've only ever seen it on ad people :p
obviously its circumstantial evidence at best but its not worth dying over. if you're suspicious, dont test your luck... a lesson which i learnt earlier this world
K, thanks for answering, I wish there was a way to stop clients with unfair advantages. I've had people talk in numbers to me and it's scary when you don't know what they are doing.
Jalpha wrote:I believe in my interpretation of things.
NOOBY93 wrote:Amanda44 wrote:_Gunnar wrote:i dont know either lol but i've only ever seen it on ad people :p
obviously its circumstantial evidence at best but its not worth dying over. if you're suspicious, dont test your luck... a lesson which i learnt earlier this world
K, thanks for answering, I wish there was a way to stop clients with unfair advantages. I've had people talk in numbers to me and it's scary when you don't know what they are doing.
You mean like @track[numbers numbers][numbers]?
That happens when finding wells, tracking, etc.
If it's scary just imagine they're trying their luck in finding a high Q well.
Return to In Congress Assembled
Users browsing this forum: Claude [Bot] and 0 guests