The fall of IF and bad trustworthiness (Death of a Nooby'ie)

Forum for discussing in game politics, village relations and matters of justice.

Re: The fall of IF and bad trustworthiness

Postby NOOBY93 » Wed Jul 17, 2013 11:04 am

Image
Image
Jalpha wrote:I believe in my interpretation of things.
User avatar
NOOBY93
 
Posts: 6528
Joined: Tue Aug 09, 2011 1:12 pm

Re: The fall of IF and bad trustworthiness

Postby Savori » Wed Jul 17, 2013 11:31 am

HasseKebab wrote:Check outside your walls NOOBY, Do you see me & my private army? heuhheuheu :lol:
No trees were killed by this post, but a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.
User avatar
Savori
 
Posts: 181
Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2011 5:12 pm
Location: behind you....

Re: The fall of IF and bad trustworthiness

Postby NOOBY93 » Wed Jul 17, 2013 11:43 am

Savori wrote:
HasseKebab wrote:Check outside your walls NOOBY, Do you see me & my private army? heuhheuheu :lol:

Yeah I checked and saw some douchebags, but now they're gone (for now I guess)
I'll be ready, Kebab. You're tasty food.
Jalpha wrote:I believe in my interpretation of things.
User avatar
NOOBY93
 
Posts: 6528
Joined: Tue Aug 09, 2011 1:12 pm

Re: The fall of IF and bad trustworthiness

Postby Dzedajus » Wed Jul 17, 2013 12:05 pm

Wouldn't expect less from gaylord shitposter Nooby. Best w7 thread.
Also you make it sound like the WHOLE node was claimed and zachary was leaving vandalism scents all over the node.
User avatar
Dzedajus
 
Posts: 1099
Joined: Sat Feb 05, 2011 9:08 pm

Re: The fall of IF and bad trustworthiness

Postby NOOBY93 » Wed Jul 17, 2013 12:13 pm

Dzedajus wrote:Wouldn't expect less from gaylord shitposter Nooby. Best w7 thread.
Also you make it sound like the WHOLE node was claimed and zachary was leaving vandalism scents all over the node.

Well the whole node WAS claimed but we gave him access so he can forage while Krikke is offline, to get himself some nice Q mussels
Instead he did it while Krikke is online too, which we had earlier told him not to, therefore keys were stolen
Then he decided to be a douchebag on Skype, hence the complete loss of property
Then he stole our pearls, the end.
Jalpha wrote:I believe in my interpretation of things.
User avatar
NOOBY93
 
Posts: 6528
Joined: Tue Aug 09, 2011 1:12 pm

Re: The fall of IF and bad trustworthiness

Postby CloudJhi » Wed Jul 17, 2013 12:18 pm

NOOBY93 wrote:
Dzedajus wrote:Wouldn't expect less from gaylord shitposter Nooby. Best w7 thread.
Also you make it sound like the WHOLE node was claimed and zachary was leaving vandalism scents all over the node.

Well the whole node WAS claimed but we gave him access so he can forage while Krikke is offline, to get himself some nice Q mussels
Instead he did it while Krikke is online too, which we had earlier told him not to, therefore keys were stolen
Then he decided to be a douchebag on Skype, hence the complete loss of property
Then he stole our pearls, the end.


And our shoddy b12, don't forget that one!
Currently being auctioned at 350 points however, it's a funny thing.
W3 to W6 - Blockland. Special mentions: New Avalon, Tarn of Hotdog, Red October.
W7 - Elvenia, til we all got lazy.
W8 - Cult of R'lyeh, til the deeps called us back.
W9 - Tartarus, til death/wizards came for the land itself.
W10 - ???, ruined and forgotten.
User avatar
CloudJhi
 
Posts: 456
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 11:06 am
Location: The Pearl of the Orient

Re: The fall of IF and bad trustworthiness

Postby Dzedajus » Wed Jul 17, 2013 12:19 pm

According to Zachary you just used that one time when he did forage when krikke was online and imo you just needed any retarded reason to raid him.
Yeah i saw that strategy in minecraft servers full of "huehehuhehue lolumad xDDDD 13 year olds".
User avatar
Dzedajus
 
Posts: 1099
Joined: Sat Feb 05, 2011 9:08 pm

Re: The fall of IF and bad trustworthiness

Postby NOOBY93 » Wed Jul 17, 2013 12:20 pm

Dzedajus wrote:According to Zachary you just used that one time when he did forage when krikke was online and imo you just needed any retarded reason to raid him.
Yeah i saw that strategy in minecraft servers full of "huehehuhehue lolumad xDDDD 13 year olds".

I've had PLENTY of reasons to raid him before, so what you say is not the case.
Jalpha wrote:I believe in my interpretation of things.
User avatar
NOOBY93
 
Posts: 6528
Joined: Tue Aug 09, 2011 1:12 pm

Re: The fall of IF and bad trustworthiness

Postby Dzedajus » Wed Jul 17, 2013 12:21 pm

The amounts of shitposting and shit you spout makes you seem like that kind of person.
User avatar
Dzedajus
 
Posts: 1099
Joined: Sat Feb 05, 2011 9:08 pm

Re: The fall of IF and bad trustworthiness

Postby NOOBY93 » Wed Jul 17, 2013 12:22 pm

Dzedajus wrote:The amounts of shitposting and shit you spout makes you seem like that kind of person.

I don't care, what bothers me though is the subjectiveness of the people on these forums. It's not who did what, it's who is more popular around here.
Like, I made less damage than your average ranger around the hearthlands, but I get lots of flame on a single Zach's QQ thread because of what? Because people want me to be the barbaric son of a bitch Zach tried to make me look like for a reason to attack me.
Jalpha wrote:I believe in my interpretation of things.
User avatar
NOOBY93
 
Posts: 6528
Joined: Tue Aug 09, 2011 1:12 pm

PreviousNext

Return to In Congress Assembled

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Claude [Bot] and 0 guests