Dzedajus wrote:I think nooby already has one of those bots that post shit on forums.
Jalpha wrote:I believe in my interpretation of things.
Tonkyhonk wrote:Eemerald wrote:but the only reason I commented back was because u involved my town in a generalisation of your own based on a comment ramones made. And I realise you think i'm still 'wrong' or whatever in allowing bots to be used in my town, or to trade and gain things from trades, but that's fine, you don't need to like it, it's how we choose to play. But my town isn't controlled by bots, I don't use them and the majority of my town don't and those that do, do so because its how they prefer to play.
what outstanding villagers say represents his/her village to the public. sometimes a villager who doesnt fit in speaks too loud or gives some false info, but as long as the leader leaves him/her be, id take it the same as the shared will/view of the village he/she belongs to unless specifically noted otherwise.
and where did i say you are 'wrong'? i dont think i did.Eemerald wrote:as for regulation, I don't have issue with it, so I wouldn't regulate it personally, I only asked how ud propose on doing so if any trader was ever going to have an issue with dealing with people who bot their stuff since you mentioned the trade issue.Tonkyhonk wrote:it is not about regulations, but it is about your advertising "we accept all botted items too" comment that encourages it.

Return to In Congress Assembled
Users browsing this forum: Claude [Bot], Yandex [Bot] and 1 guest