Lordtimo wrote:Both guys confirmed huge retards, end of the story.
Yet the validity of their points are not determined by this factor. People tend to forget this.
Lordtimo wrote:Both guys confirmed huge retards, end of the story.
GrapefruitV wrote:windmaker wrote:what part of "off topic " u cant understand?" ,the topic is about oathkill (trade relations) and him have proofs of that, and u not, u just call it faggot (and u can do it ofc) but is still a off topic.
By faggot in this context I meant "he is a proven scammer and fake feedbacks writer, which would be as bad, even if the whole community was made of thieves". It's not just throwing at him random irrelevant insult. To be considered an oathkiller you need to actually kill a real char or a char with valuables. A fresh alt with empty inventory was killed for making an attempt of stealing, only as sick people as petal can consider that as oathkilling. Both threads "Holya is bad" and "Petal is bad" are about the same event, so there is no big difference in which one to post about that. Clear?
Ninijutsu wrote:Lordtimo wrote:Both guys confirmed huge retards, end of the story.
Yet the validity of their points are not determined by this factor. People tend to forget this.
petal wrote:things..
windmaker wrote:u are wrong , oath kill is oath kill. no matter what char ... now the proofs shows a fact, petal go out without payment, but he die and probably (very probably) cant try to steal, him just try it (i believe this bcs i follow the logic events about holya and other tradings (ssaj for be exact). if u dont want see it, is your problem tbh.
GrapefruitV wrote:Oathkill is not "a kill of an oathed char" it is a term used to describe a variety of traps based on oathing people with false intentions to do some damage and/or get some benefits. Did Holya do any damage to petal? I don't think so. Did he gain any profit? No, there was no items involved from petal's side. Petal did not lose anything, while Holya was at risk of loosing a couple of rings. So after all no one was hurt, but the one who had much more chances to end up as a victim was Holya. I've heard from people I trust that he is quite a faggot, but it seems like he cares about his reputation, so he would do that on an alt, if he wanted to steal petals pearls, atleast to make him bring those pearls in the first place. 9 pearls and death of one person (no matter how annoying the person is) doesn't worth a months of work on reputation, this fact itself is enough to choose whom to believe.
GrapefruitV wrote:Try to read before posting.
petal wrote:after he obviously got caught?
Users browsing this forum: Claude [Bot] and 0 guests