sabinati wrote:goatse banner
Please show me where in the image I posted "goatse" was visible.
For those who didn't see it, the banner I posted was a drawn recreation of the original goatse, placed on a tiny banner. There was no visible genitalia in the picture, as they were cropped out.
As formerly mentioned in the thread, the image itself was only barely recognizable to those who'd viewed goatse before. No minors could be harmed from this.
Therefore it seems that you are implying that the mere concept of "goatse" is deemed offensive as it may invoke negative feelings. Going in the same vein, you could argue that the skulls in the banners are even more offensive as they are common imaginary linked to multiple genocides and acts of cruelty.
Furthermore, more offensive than the ban itself, you post claiming that I posted goatse, when in fact I posted two alternative banners that I am personally torn in between: the goatse concept and the scheming jew concept. Yet your removed both images, leaving behind implication that I am merely a shitposter that posts goatse on the forums.
Sir, you'll be hearing from my lawyer.