burgingham wrote:Our group is basically 75% assembled. The rest will certainly meet us tomorrow.
burgingham wrote:I can ssure you that not all of us are underage. Most people who have no issues with this seem to actually have a stable job, at least from what I have gathered so far.
If the 10$ are an issue still then I can totally understand that, but then I do not understand why one rages on the forums about it. You cannot afford to play a game? Then you cannot afford to play a game. End of discussion. What does HnH or the devs have to do with that?
dank_memes wrote:I feel like most of the people here who argue that everybody should be able to afford paying $72/year for this game are themselves underage and have no idea how budgeting works as their parents buy them games or they get allowance. I'm not saying this to be offensive, but I've never seen an adult not understand what a monthly subscription meant.
dank_memes wrote: treat his players as if they were acting entitled for expecting a free game to remain free
dank_memes wrote:burgingham wrote:I can ssure you that not all of us are underage. Most people who have no issues with this seem to actually have a stable job, at least from what I have gathered so far.
If the 10$ are an issue still then I can totally understand that, but then I do not understand why one rages on the forums about it. You cannot afford to play a game? Then you cannot afford to play a game. End of discussion. What does HnH or the devs have to do with that?
I could only surmise that people are either surprised by the sudden announcement of p2p (after two years of advertising the overhaul without any mention of it), or simply disappointed because they don't think the game is worth the price tag that has been put on it.
Look at it this way; you've been playing this free game for months or years, and looking forward to a major, major update, only to find out on update day that your playtime has been limited to 24 minutes a day and that you'll have to pay to play more. Who in their right mind wouldn't get upset by this unpleasant surprise? (I also strongly disagree that the game going p2p was something to be "expected", given that it ran on donations for so long and there were barely any mentions of p2p before).
Jorb's snide remarks also provide very little help to staunch the community's ire. Rather than calmly explaining why the move to p2p was a necessity while addressing the users' concerns, he chose to be condescending and treat his players as if they were acting entitled for expecting a free game to remain free and being surprised when it does not.
Jackard wrote:Starting gameplay much worse than the original Haven. No direction or positive feedback, no visual aids to indicate respawns, tons of trash items, dearth of discoveries or explanations, everything is waiting for something else to happen.
Waiting for LP
Waiting for friends
Waiting for respawns
Waiting for recipe unlocks
Waiting for food
Waiting for hunger
Waiting for satiations
I have not found a single cone or birchbark in these last four (five?) hours of play.
burgingham wrote:It has been announced. They gave a friggin interview about it where it was clearly stated the game was being monetized...
Users browsing this forum: Claude [Bot], Python-Requests [Bot] and 74 guests