burgingham wrote:jewboi wrote:burgingham wrote:What else am I supposed to tell you other than to read it again? There is a lot of conditional content in my text. I said: "X and Y is flawed, but that does not mean that Z". Maybe you break the text down into smaller pieces. Then it might become more obvious. Also you should include the conclusion.
No you're saying 'X and Y is flawed but let's see what Z does.' There's no other useful or conditional content. If I say you're a fag but some days you go deep in beastiality, does this make you not a fag anymore? It's flawed, so let's fix it.
You may interpret my comment this way, but that is not what it says in the text. I am saying they did most things write but the shop layout, maybe prices and also communication need some twitches to become more accepted. That easy enough for you to understand? Or do you still want to twist it in a way that suits you.
You cannot actually tell a person they did not say what they actually said..because well you know, they said it. Especially when it is done in a pretty comprehensive way.
You just don't want to admit anything, everything is reading semantics which is with the entire forum btw, not just me. 'N-no they're not flaws! They just need to work on it!' Fuck off, they're flaws and nothing is going to change that. You just want to leave the thread on top of the mountain, even if it's banning users.