Divine Intervention: The Case of Core vs ST & CotTK

Announcements about major changes in Haven & Hearth.

Re: Divine Intervention: The Case of Core vs ST & CotTK

Postby Projeear » Sun Sep 27, 2015 10:28 am

Grand Walker of World 1 (w1).
Ex-Lawspeaker of New London, Deadwood and New Deadwood (w3).
Witness of the World 4 Great Explosion (w4).
Ex-Lawspeaker of Gregminster (w5).
Ex-Lawspeaker of Laketown (w6).
Squatter and Rebuilder of Templus Pacis (w6).
Hermit thereafter.
Lawspeaker of Tachbrookshire (Hafen 2)
User avatar
Projeear
 
Posts: 950
Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2011 2:02 am
Location: Jolly ol' England

Re: Divine Intervention: The Case of Core vs ST & CotTK

Postby Headshot » Sun Sep 27, 2015 10:35 am

How stupid are you?


Well, not so dumb as dude with dick on userpick.
W3 - Vitterstad | Headhunter [Lawspeaker]
W4 - AD/Sparta | VIII The Justice [Fighter]
W5 - Vitterstad | Headhunter [Founder]
H8 - Core | Headhunt [Founder]
H10 - Dis | Dominar Morghoul [Council]
H12 - Wild West Exodus | Headshot [Lawspeaker]
H13 - TPDR | Headshot [Member]
H14 - Definitely Not Abusers | Headhunter [Member]
H15 - Mental Disorder | Headshot [Member]
H16 - hidden
User avatar
Headshot
 
Posts: 236
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2010 6:04 am

Re: Divine Intervention: The Case of Core vs ST & CotTK

Postby Potjeh » Sun Sep 27, 2015 10:35 am

burgingham wrote:Jesus you are paranoid ^^ So what are we doing there?

It is basically a C&I forum that is easier to read for the devs + a moderation thread. They don't give a shit what we suggest if they do not like the idea themselves. We do not get any more infos than you guys either. Not before launch and not after.

I wouldn't even mind if the IP was free for all to read. Really nothing secret going on there.

We do get to learn the secret handshakes, though.
Image Bottleneck
User avatar
Potjeh
 
Posts: 11811
Joined: Fri May 29, 2009 4:03 pm

Re: Divine Intervention: The Case of Core vs ST & CotTK

Postby Kaios » Sun Sep 27, 2015 10:36 am

Headshot wrote:Well, not so dumb as dude with dick on userpick.


Not true apparently, I didn't go and abuse any bugs thinking there would be no consequences.
User avatar
Kaios
 
Posts: 9171
Joined: Fri Jul 30, 2010 2:14 am

Re: Divine Intervention: The Case of Core vs ST & CotTK

Postby VDZ » Sun Sep 27, 2015 10:42 am

Tacheron wrote:If you really want proper restitution for the victims - you should create a special, very fast curio in the hearth fire of each killed player with the amount of LP equal to the LP they had at the time of death and a little something extra cause of all the feps lost. THAT would be restitution character-wise.


Then the village divides the curios such that a select few characters receive all the uber-curios and FEP restitution, creating warriors far more powerful than could naturally exist at this time, and become capable of dominating the entire area with their military might. Hey, if the restitution is good enough they might even get palibashers.

Restitution in any shape or form will always negatively impact game balance. Plus, it sets a precedent that will make future victims complain 'but they got free uber-curios, why don't we get uber-curios, devs are playing favorites'.

Kaios wrote:
Headshot wrote:Well, not so dumb as dude with dick on userpick.


Not true apparently, I didn't go and abuse any bugs thinking there would be no consequences.


To be fair, there used to be no consequences before. It was not entirely unreasonable to think you could get away with it.
User avatar
VDZ
 
Posts: 2681
Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2011 2:27 am

Re: Divine Intervention: The Case of Core vs ST & CotTK

Postby Kaios » Sun Sep 27, 2015 10:48 am

VDZ wrote:To be fair, there used to be no consequences before. It was not entirely unreasonable to think you could get away with it.


His first thought should have been, "As a paying player, would I be fucking pissed if I got bug raided this world?"

And then his brain overheats because it's working too hard.
User avatar
Kaios
 
Posts: 9171
Joined: Fri Jul 30, 2010 2:14 am

Re: Divine Intervention: The Case of Core vs ST & CotTK

Postby Tacheron » Sun Sep 27, 2015 10:50 am

VDZ wrote:
Tacheron wrote:If you really want proper restitution for the victims - you should create a special, very fast curio in the hearth fire of each killed player with the amount of LP equal to the LP they had at the time of death and a little something extra cause of all the feps lost. THAT would be restitution character-wise.


Then the village divides the curios...


I meant to make them similar to hats - only the HF owner can use them - but a one time consumable.
This is not a test of power
This is not a game to be lost or won
Let justice be done
User avatar
Tacheron
 
Posts: 837
Joined: Fri Apr 16, 2010 12:11 pm

Re: Divine Intervention: The Case of Core vs ST & CotTK

Postby g1real » Sun Sep 27, 2015 10:51 am

Why do people keep using the lack of a common sense as an excuse every time?

It's pretty fucking common sense that you'll get shat on if you exploit a major bug, especially in PvP scenarios.
loftar: The inner chaos of the Jorbian mind is hard to conceal. :)
jorb: It's called creative license. You know, that thing you seem to want to apply to logic, grammar and coherence? :)
User avatar
g1real
 
Posts: 881
Joined: Sun Aug 09, 2009 10:30 am
Location: You are now breathing manually.

Re: Divine Intervention: The Case of Core vs ST & CotTK

Postby Projeear » Sun Sep 27, 2015 11:05 am

Image
Grand Walker of World 1 (w1).
Ex-Lawspeaker of New London, Deadwood and New Deadwood (w3).
Witness of the World 4 Great Explosion (w4).
Ex-Lawspeaker of Gregminster (w5).
Ex-Lawspeaker of Laketown (w6).
Squatter and Rebuilder of Templus Pacis (w6).
Hermit thereafter.
Lawspeaker of Tachbrookshire (Hafen 2)
User avatar
Projeear
 
Posts: 950
Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2011 2:02 am
Location: Jolly ol' England

Re: Divine Intervention: The Case of Core vs ST & CotTK

Postby romovs » Sun Sep 27, 2015 11:10 am

burgingham wrote:I wouldn't even mind if the IP was free for all to read. Really nothing secret going on there.

Moments later..
burgingham wrote:Having the same discussion in IP right now. Seems to be very much intended by the devs.


Image
User avatar
romovs
 
Posts: 1472
Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2013 9:26 am
Location: The Tabouret

PreviousNext

Return to Announcements

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Claude [Bot], Python-Requests [Bot] and 6 guests