Hasta wrote:Too bad this system drastically differt from what devs have in mind for this game (a persistent, self-sustaining and evolving world).
We could call server A legacy and players could play the old 2D version of the game!...
Hasta wrote:Too bad this system drastically differt from what devs have in mind for this game (a persistent, self-sustaining and evolving world).
donatas wrote:Damn legacy haven and hearth had at least over 200 players at the time, but haven and hearth 2 always below 200 mark. Well hopefully devs do get the income from this small player base. Also how come there are no reviews for haven and hearth 2? Since in a way its a new game.
MagicManICT wrote:Lack of any content other than grind and "player projects."
shubla wrote:donatas wrote:Damn legacy haven and hearth had at least over 200 players at the time, but haven and hearth 2 always below 200 mark. Well hopefully devs do get the income from this small player base. Also how come there are no reviews for haven and hearth 2? Since in a way its a new game.
Player count is over 200 occasionally (almost) everyday.
Also in legacy there werent 200 players playing.
There were just so many alts and bots. I had many accounts logged in pretty much all the time botting me purlz and stuff.
Hasta wrote:MagicManICT wrote:Lack of any content other than grind and "player projects."
dzielny_wojownik wrote:note that legacy world which was 2+ years old had more players than hafen does 6 months in world
MagicManICT wrote:dzielny_wojownik wrote:note that legacy world which was 2+ years old had more players than hafen does 6 months in world
It was up and down in w7. There were points it was dropping to 100. W6 barely stayed over 100 due to some horrendous lag issues.
jorb wrote:All your characters will be deleted, and I will level every village any one of them were ever members of.
Users browsing this forum: Claude [Bot], Python-Requests [Bot] and 49 guests