CSPAN wrote:SpidersEverywhere wrote:Hm. So I'm a hermit, not much past the 50 cap and unlikely to ever hit 125. I sort of feel like I just wasted my money on a 3 month subscription since it will now do absolutely nothing for me, especially when starting from scratch. I'm not sure how I feel about all this.
Games in Alpha, or eternal alpha arent concrete, you should always keep in the back of your mind a drastic change can come, this game is experimenting to find its niche. Your sub will carry over to the next iteration, to what I think will be a much healthier world.
boshaw wrote:CSPAN wrote:botters so mad right now
Why would botters be mad? They will be able to create dozens of stat-capped characters which still gives them advantage, especially in numbers wins based combat system.
qawrad wrote:pay2win
loftar wrote:Technically speaking, you don't win for paying. In particular, you don't win more by paying more. If anything, you don't win if you don't pay, but that's a different thing.
passwort wrote:"Significantly reduce the size of the world with the new map."
I think one of the best features of H&H w8 was the gigantic world where you could find your very own place, in 6 months in w9 new players will find a base every 0.01 steps
Kaios wrote:sabinati wrote:the payment model seems dumb and bad to me as well.
think harder about that, please.
Think at all, rather. 200 point stat and quality caps wtf let's give a big round of applause to Potjeh, thanks Potjeh.
loftar wrote:sabinati wrote:the payment model seems dumb and bad to me as well.
think harder about that, please.
What would be better, though? I'd like to point out that this also seems to be the same model that Wurm uses.
Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot], Claude [Bot], Facebook [Bot], Python-Requests [Bot] and 9 guests