pedorlee wrote:But they where the ones taking the initiative and abusing the mechanic.
If you're going to keep insisting on this, I think you could at least try and counter the arguments made in the verdict.
Tonkyhonk wrote:im not even sure if it was supposed to be something someone should have reported or concerned as everything seemed to have worked the way it should to me...i mean, isnt it the security problem of those who got raided in this case?
Sure, but I think it's fair to say that it's muddy enough that they ought to have made a report just in case, and that not doing so displays less-than-optimal judgment. If they are open to "experimenting" with game mechanics, it seems only fair that they ought to open to it both ways. ^^