loftar wrote:Amanda44 wrote:Question ... what happens if you sub, reach the cap and then stop subbing? You stay at the higher stats? Don't you see a flaw with that?loftar wrote:The idea right now is that stats are temporarily debuffed when lacking a subscription, until the account is subscribed again. We've considered both debuffing them down to the default or to some higher value than that for having once had a subscription. Feel free to opine.
loftar wrote:Amanda44 wrote:Question ... what happens if you sub, reach the cap and then stop subbing? You stay at the higher stats? Don't you see a flaw with that?loftar wrote:The idea right now is that stats are temporarily debuffed when lacking a subscription, until the account is subscribed again. We've considered both debuffing them down to the default or to some higher value than that for having once had a subscription. Feel free to opine.
passwort wrote:That payment model is clearly pay2win,
passwort wrote:That payment model is clearly pay2win, I wont say the old one was better, but the new one takes the illusion to be able to participate in late game and thus takes away the will to even start playing since all you will archieve is at most mediocre
My opinion: I dont like it
jorb wrote:qawrad wrote:last 100 players leave
Post count: 4. Player confirmed for losing a wicker basket and his very own pine tree.
Cajoes wrote:I was the murder victim your guy aggro'd. And slew. Entirely unprovoked. Rather handily at that. Which prompted the retaliatory party. That you also handily slew.
SpidersEverywhere wrote:Hm. So I'm a hermit, not much past the 50 cap and unlikely to ever hit 125. I sort of feel like I just wasted my money on a 3 month subscription since it will now do absolutely nothing for me, especially when starting from scratch. I'm not sure how I feel about all this.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Naylok, Python-Requests [Bot], terechgracz and 31 guests