MrPunchers wrote:or they added proper tanning fluid (woo).
Is there anything improper about the already existing tanning fluid?
MrPunchers wrote:or they added proper tanning fluid (woo).
loftar wrote:Hearths are checked instead of character locations, rather than both, if that's what you meant.
Kaios wrote:I'm just thinking about the original intent which was claiming a mass of area so you have higher chance of getting players on to your realm claim to feed it so I'm not sure why that isn't a thing now
jorb wrote:MrPunchers wrote:or they added proper tanning fluid (woo).
Is there anything improper about the already existing tanning fluid?
MrPunchers wrote:Never heard of people using Tree Bark as tanning fluid.
MrPunchers wrote:Never heard of people using Tree Bark as tanning fluid. Heard about Sinew/Tendons/Cartilage as materials for fluid, however.
Literally the first sentence on Wikipedia wrote:The English word for tanning is from medieval Latin tannāre, deriv. of tannum (oak bark), related to Old High German tanna meaning oak or fir (related to modern Tannenbaum). This refers to use of the bark of oaks (the original source of tannin) in some kinds of hide preservation.
loftar wrote:We did consider, for the record, making it so that authority is gained from both the hearth-fire location and the active player location, and are still open for decision in the matter.
loftar wrote:We did consider, for the record, making it so that authority is gained from both the hearth-fire location and the active player location, and are still open for decision in the matter.