Ysh wrote:This is illegal to do I think. What sound more likely to you? I am enchanted and have might of four men or China company is breaking labor law? I think this is obvious enough.
Occams razor would suggest that they used the wrong box

Ysh wrote:This is illegal to do I think. What sound more likely to you? I am enchanted and have might of four men or China company is breaking labor law? I think this is obvious enough.
Granger wrote:Ysh wrote:This is illegal to do I think. What sound more likely to you? I am enchanted and have might of four men or China company is breaking labor law? I think this is obvious enough.
Occams razor would suggest that they used the wrong box
Kaios wrote:Spice Girls are integral to understanding Ysh's thought process when communicating, duly noted.
Jalpha wrote:Workplace health and safety legislation within Australia requires that any load in excess of 35kgs be lifted by two people in order to prevent the possibility of injury. An exception to this is when a load is ungainly or awkward to handle, in which case the weight limit may be set much lower.
Are this guidelines set much lower where you live perhaps? Fear of lawsuits?
dageir wrote:On a side note: why are there so many car tires outside your house?
Kaios wrote:Spice Girls are integral to understanding Ysh's thought process when communicating, duly noted.
dageir wrote:Won't the tires "leak" substances into the ground?
Kaios wrote:Spice Girls are integral to understanding Ysh's thought process when communicating, duly noted.
dageir wrote:Won't the tires "leak" substances into the ground?
jorb wrote:Hitting a "Ghejejiiwlonk" with your "Umappawoozle" for eightyfifteen points of "Sharmakookel", simply makes no sense.
Users browsing this forum: Claude [Bot] and 264 guests