See when someone was last online

[Oswald3]

Is there a way to see when a member of my kin was last online?

[DafyddapDafydd]

Yeah, I miss this feature from Legacy. Why was it removed?

[Karede]

Would be nice to have back, that and maybe a way to tell whether they're dead or just inactive

[Ysh]

It is nice for this one having.

[Amanda44]

I'm against it's return ... it's akin to spying on ppl, though I wouldn't mind your suggestion Karede, a way to tell if a player is actually dead.

[Ysh]

I'm against it's return ... it's akin to spying on ppl, though I wouldn't mind your suggestion Karede, a way to tell if a player is actually dead.

If player agrees to kin is it really spying?

[Hasta]

I'm against it's return ... it's akin to spying on ppl, though I wouldn't mind your suggestion Karede, a way to tell if a player is actually dead.

If player agrees to kin is it really spying?

Since the feature wasn't implemented before, some people go around making kin of basically everything that moves. If the feature is implemented now, it will change the meaning and consequences of making some stranger your kin, so, either all kinlists should be cleared, or left as is, leaving the possibility of espionage. Both options would be very inconvenient. On the other hand, they did implement gilding, rendering a lot of prevoius mechanics and items useless, so I guess "making a huge change that will put a lot of players in disadvantage comparing to previous state" is not something devs would be concerned about.

But, tl;dr, yes, it will technically allow some unauthorised spying if implemented mid-world.

[Porterwake]

Sheesh if you feel like one of your village mates is spying on you or micromanaging you, get the heck out.

[Karede]

Because your kin list is only for villagemates, right.

[Ysh]

I'm against it's return ... it's akin to spying on ppl, though I wouldn't mind your suggestion Karede, a way to tell if a player is actually dead.

If player agrees to kin is it really spying?

Since the feature wasn't implemented before, some people go around making kin of basically everything that moves. If the feature is implemented now, it will change the meaning and consequences of making some stranger your kin, so, either all kinlists should be cleared, or left as is, leaving the possibility of espionage. Both options would be very inconvenient. On the other hand, they did implement gilding, rendering a lot of prevoius mechanics and items useless, so I guess "making a huge change that will put a lot of players in disadvantage comparing to previous state" is not something devs would be concerned about.

But, tl;dr, yes, it will technically allow some unauthorised spying if implemented mid-world.

Because your kin list is only for villagemates, right.

It will make this kinship slightly with more risky. But is ''this will change current function'' an argument against changing some game mechanics? Is it not possible to just remove some player from your kin? I have never tried this one. If it is this case for kin being unable for removed, then this is valid arguments. Such ability for removal should be added for changing kin informations I think.