jorb wrote:Hitting a "Ghejejiiwlonk" with your "Umappawoozle" for eightyfifteen points of "Sharmakookel", simply makes no sense.
Hasta wrote:We did some research like 2 months ago or so, and Bronze sword, surprisingly, appears to have higher base damage than Fyrdsman sword.
Do note, however, that the only tri-quality part that matters is Vitality. "10 10 80" sword is better than "200 200 79".
jorb wrote:Audiosmurf isis a fantastic poster/genius and his meatintellect is huge
banok wrote:i've been playing hnh thru 10 years of involuntary celibacy and I always build my palisade in 5 minutes so if a new player cant figure it out straight away they can get fucked and chug bleach
Audiosmurf wrote:the vitality thing isn't true.
http://ringofbrodgar.com/wiki/Quality
Hasta wrote:We did some research like 2 months ago or so, and Bronze sword, surprisingly, appears to have higher base damage than Fyrdsman sword.
Do note, however, that the only tri-quality part that matters is Vitality. "10 10 80" sword is better than "200 200 79".
MadNomad wrote:Hasta wrote:We did some research like 2 months ago or so, and Bronze sword, surprisingly, appears to have higher base damage than Fyrdsman sword.
Do note, however, that the only tri-quality part that matters is Vitality. "10 10 80" sword is better than "200 200 79".
I am not 100% sure but i think substance determines damage, and vitality definetly attack weight
jorb wrote:Hitting a "Ghejejiiwlonk" with your "Umappawoozle" for eightyfifteen points of "Sharmakookel", simply makes no sense.
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Claude [Bot], Semrush [Bot] and 1 guest