1) Is ore quality softcapped by your mining tool? Stone seems not to be (nor cat gold) but I'm seeing this curious thing:
- q43 Cat Gold dropping from a vein giving me q41-q37 ore. (Masonry 53 so no problem there.)
I'm mining with a q36 stone axe.
If the rock/ore is q43 and it's being softcapped by my q36 axe it should be spitting out Q39. I'm seeing +2/-2 around that, however. With rounding being the way it is, I'm suspecting that's what happening is the ore is +5/-5 (like trees crops and livestock) from the rock quality and /that/ is being softcapped by my tool? Is this known behavior? If so, it suggests that I should NOT make a Q35 pickaxe since this will increase my softcapping penalty, even though it would make the mining itself easier.
But this raises two more questions:
2) Does Deep Artifice (which I have) improve the behavior of the +5/-5? Is that what 'better ores' means? I've mostly found that the bar yield in my batches since getting DA has gone down, but that could just be clustering. Certainly it doesn't seem pronouncedly higher, however.
3) Does the double-quality effect of the pickaxe also apply to softcapping questions? IOW: Does a Q22 Pickaxe softcap like a Q44 stone axe? That would make the q35 Pickaxe a no brainer as I'm WAY away from q70 stone axe.