@Redempter
I can understand your stance. However NB thinks everyone with one faction or friends of the faction are the same thing. That means the same must apply to your and your ideals as well.
overtyped wrote:I didnt know you were more stubborn than me, but I guess you are. You are more willing to talk in a endless circle of already answered arguments than I will ever be. Good day to you.
dageir wrote:overtyped wrote:dageir wrote:For an outsider it looks like the ideals of Brodgar has been left, an a new raider faction has arisen.
"Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he does not become a monster.
And if you gaze long enough into an abyss, the abyss will gaze back into you."
Friedrich Nietzsche
If broder is a raider faction, please list one example of an unprovoked attack.
This should be easy enough??
I do not like to go ad hominem here, but the fact that you are associated with, or in New Brodgar, confirms that you most likely
are a raider group. No offence intended.
RedKGB wrote:@Redempter
I can understand your stance. However NB thinks everyone with one faction or friends of the faction are the same thing. That means the same must apply to your and your ideals as well.
overtyped wrote:I didnt know you were more stubborn than me, but I guess you are. You are more willing to talk in a endless circle of already answered arguments than I will ever be. Good day to you.
RedKGB wrote:Killing people is war. Burning everything to the gound is raiding. You are cute when you make no sense.
RedKGB wrote:Killing people is war. Burning everything to the gound is raiding. You are cute when you make no sense.
dageir wrote:I think I remember the Germans stated that the Polish attaked them on september 1st 1939.
(Un)fortunately for the Germans they had alot of divisions ready with alot of tanks, stukas and horses
ready to defend themselves.
Onep wrote:You're just making up your own definitions here! Bad form!
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/raiding?s=t
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/war?s=t
overtyped wrote:I didnt know you were more stubborn than me, but I guess you are. You are more willing to talk in a endless circle of already answered arguments than I will ever be. Good day to you.
Users browsing this forum: Claude [Bot] and 0 guests