
shubla wrote:and dont use some shady email addresses.
loftar » 30 Apr 2016 wrote:I've seen at least one similar report in the last few days. I checked out the e-mails mentioned in that report, which were bound to a GMail address, but GMail had reported that they had been properly received. I also tested with a GMail address myself, and had my e-mails properly delivered to it. Not sure if there even is a real issue yet (or if it is a case of user error), or what that issue would be, more exactly.
If you PM me the e-mail addresses, I can check those too against the logs.
Users browsing this forum: BLEX [Bot], Claude [Bot], Semrush [Bot] and 1 guest