Travel weariness at 115%

[Justforthis]

I honestly don't know if this is a bug or not, seems to me like it probably is tough as I assume you shouldn't be able to get over 100% at all.
I don't know how this happned, but I can tell you I did NOT first reach 100% and then teleport to hearthfire 15 times. I got this from using my roads.
And when I say I don't know how this happned I mean it. I just logged in and it was like this, from what I remember I had somewhere around 85% when I logged out near a resource node. Logged back in today and it was 115%.

[Granger]

You likely removed gear that gave a will bonus, or a buff to will expired.

Not a bug, you could lower your will temporarily to remove TW in case it wouldn't work that way...

[Justforthis]

You likely removed gear that gave a will bonus, or a buff to will expired.

Not a bug, you could lower your will temporarily to remove TW in case it wouldn't work that way...

I don't change any gear on my alt. However he might have had a wound (?). Edit: Actually, a buff makes total sense, I was outside the HH claim when I noticed this and live within their borders. Feel free to delete the thread as it seems I was completely wrong. Sorry.

I collected the resource and teleported home and my travel weariness was restored to 88% after returning. It seems kinda likely that it is as you say and that the "graphic" or whatchamacall it just hadn't updated.

[Granger]

Is your alt using pipestuff?

[Justforthis]

Is your alt using pipestuff?

I edited my post aswell but: I didn't know travel weariness had to do with will at all until you said that it has. And now I saw that the HH kingdom buff gives Will. I was outside the HH kingdom claim when I noticed the 115% travel weariness.
The number doesn't seem to update unless you teleport or log out.

[Granger]

Not a bug then

[shubla]

This is not the first, nor the last time that this gets reported.
I think that something should be done to avoid threads like this in the future.
Just adding some text that indicatesthat it is intentional.

[MagicManICT]

This is not the first, nor the last time that this gets reported.
I think that something should be done to avoid threads like this in the future.
Just adding some text that indicatesthat it is intentional.

People report other issues that aren't a bug and are more obvious and known.

[wonder-ass]

or just make it so it never exceeds 100% ?

[Granger]

or just make it so it never exceeds 100% ?

Just the display of it? Could work.

But then we'll likely get bug reports that $action dosn't reduce TW as expected...