Nek wrote:jordancoles wrote:
A UA fighter can beat an mc fighter in a 1v1, mc is mainly a defense-breaker in group fights imo
loling heartily. How is this guy considered good again?
If what you're saying had a shred of truth to it, then literally every single PvPer in the game right now wouldn't be equipped with the exact same shit (Sword & Shield).
Unarmed doesn't have anything on MC. MC gets better spammable defenses (which doesn't even matter since unarmed can't even do shit to anybody wearing steel armor), as well as instant kill 300+ damage attacks. It has unarmed beat on all fronts.
You can overwhelm a melee fighter with ua combos... Playing purely MC reduces you to 2 moves. One has a long cooldown which can be hit by 3 of 4 different types of punches and the other is a fairly weak defense that you can hit right through, and if you're not running a red defense it'll just ping your armor for zero every time. You need a lot more STR than an MC character does, sure. but ua is much more defensive than mc is and can outlast if you're keeping on top of your one colour defences. Run yellow and blue and you're safe from chop, sting, storm of swords and cleave. GG, that's all MC fighters have.
The real issue is armor at the moment. UA fighters are able to break your defense, but once your opponent passes a certain level of AC it's just not viable anymore.
MC is pretty brainless and it's better for taking down defenses and doing big damage in a short amount of time (and with a shittier character), but I feel UA is better overall aside from the armor thing atm
What's the risk in posting with your real forum account? Are you afraid to get confrontational under your real name?