Credo quests should work like ancestor quests

[linkfanpc]

You get 3 sets of objectives and 1 set gives you 1 progress point and the other 2 reroll your 3 sets, or you can abandon all of them and lose 1 progress point.

Perhaps additionally, the first 2/5ths of quests should always be only 1 objective per set, 3/5 and 4/5 being 2 objectives and the latter fifth of quests needing 3 objectives. Rather than being completely random and getting given a ridiculous task list as the first quest.

Unless credo quests get reworked they are just sooo unfun and boring to play. "Chip schist" when there isn't schist within 100 supergrids or "harvest 192 grapes" taking over a week to achieve. Downright stupid.

thank you for coming to my ted talk.

[caz]

Ye it's not fun having to abandon 3 in a row after spending ages on the previous quest

[loleznub]

You need to make this suggestion have some type of drawback, perhaps by increasing the number of quests by double the current amount, or increasing the difficulty of quests, such as instead of 'Pick a spindly taproot x1', make it 'Pick a quality 29 spindly taproot'.

We don't get to have nice things, so framing it this way makes it so it may be considered.

[animary]

"...given a ridiculous task list as the first quest"

Lol, "Harvest 70 snapdragons".


And I propose if you bail a credo quest for whatever reason, that quest gets flagged so you do not get it again in that credo.