example:



There are more curios that are not optimal to make/use but by pairing them up with others into a combo might make number of curios used more diverse.
jorb wrote:Hitting a "Ghejejiiwlonk" with your "Umappawoozle" for eightyfifteen points of "Sharmakookel", simply makes no sense.
jorb wrote:I think we do something similar with combination curios such as fossil collection, and such. Not entirely opposed to the idea here, but the categorizations, like which curios go with which, seems like a bit of a pain to maintain.
Users browsing this forum: Claude [Bot], Semrush [Bot] and 41 guests