jorb wrote:Hitting a "Ghejejiiwlonk" with your "Umappawoozle" for eightyfifteen points of "Sharmakookel", simply makes no sense.
randomtelelocxyz wrote:want wish to jorb stop loving gayanal porn
jtpitner wrote:I don't see a problem just destroy ones claim and remaking it.... So please explain why would one need this ?
jorb wrote:Hitting a "Ghejejiiwlonk" with your "Umappawoozle" for eightyfifteen points of "Sharmakookel", simply makes no sense.
randomtelelocxyz wrote:want wish to jorb stop loving gayanal porn

shubla wrote:I somewhat agree. You might place the claim pole in stupid location, and regret it 5 months later. But then its too late to move it.
jorb wrote:Hitting a "Ghejejiiwlonk" with your "Umappawoozle" for eightyfifteen points of "Sharmakookel", simply makes no sense.
randomtelelocxyz wrote:want wish to jorb stop loving gayanal porn


✧ wrote:possible implementation?
If you build a claim pole on a claim you already own (which would become allowed, but only if you own the claim), it destroys the old claim pole and the new pole becomes the pole for that claim. (Kindof like how building a new hearthfire turns your old one into a campfire)

Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], BrightEyEs, Claude [Bot] and 93 guests