Please make a survey about features you add

[noindyfikator]

Please make a survey about features you want to add to the game, so you can get feedback and overview about what your players think.

Example of a nice story

1. People want to have better default client (trash talk from myself there: how the hell in a game about Quality, quality is hidden by default and reset to hidden every time you re-open client?)
2. Developers add LPH / H (in game hours ) to curio
3. Custom client developers reaction (e.g. Ender)



This is sad for me that developers spend their priceless time for such things, it was as simple as make a survey. Do you want LPH / H in game time or real time. That's all and everyone would be happy

[shubla]

Did devs really add LP/H as lp per in game hour? They must be truly retarded.

[Nightdawg]

Did devs really add LP/H as lp per in game hour? They must be truly retarded.

Are you surprised?
Did you forget the *horisontal* waterskin indicators, *barely visible* gridlines, the custom-client-like minimap that doesn't actually work like the custom client minimaps, whatever *stupid ctrl+alt+shift combination* they added to the vanilla client that's literally some dumber version of the custom client hotkeys that works in a very weird way?

If anything, it's only fascinating how they figure out a way to take something from every custom client and just make it worse, when the perfect model is just... THERE.

[donatas081294]

Did devs really add LP/H as lp per in game hour? They must be truly retarded.

At first I was like oh cool, so now I know how much lp I would gain per hour, but then made me think. Hold up wait a second. The whole LP per hour doesn't do shit, BECUASE YOU DON'T GAIN LP PER HOUR YOU GAIN IT ONCE IT FINISHES STUDYING IT. So what was the point of the LP per hour?
To let you know which is better curio? But it would have some retarded shit that curio that gives you total of 5K and 50 per hour but finishes in 5 days or curio that gives you 1K and 10 lp per hour but finishes in 10 hours. (Yes yes I know the math doesn't add up, it's just an exmaple.).

[Pommfritz]

Did devs really add LP/H as lp per in game hour? They must be truly retarded.

At first I was like oh cool, so now I know how much lp I would gain per hour, but then made me think. Hold up wait a second. The whole LP per hour doesn't do shit, BECUASE YOU DON'T GAIN LP PER HOUR YOU GAIN IT ONCE IT FINISHES STUDYING IT. So what was the point of the LP per hour?
To let you know which is better curio? But it would have some retarded shit that curio that gives you total of 5K and 50 per hour but finishes in 5 days or curio that gives you 1K and 10 lp per hour but finishes in 10 hours. (Yes yes I know the math doesn't add up, it's just an exmaple.).

if you are just starting you probably want some curios finishing fast to spend lp quickly, a bit later you minmax lp/h/int but once you have enough int to study whatever you want it's just about lp/h (or probably more correct lp/h/slot)

and to be precise I mean lp/real hour

[lordgrunt]

my jab at this. or nearby.
Why, oh, why, after implementing such a wonderful feature as area harvesting and planting would you not adjust plant/harvest algorithm? we technically got a 6x time saving feature, best average is x3.765 (j/k, to be more precise its >3 and <4) its just painful to watch my toon do it the stupid way.

[DDDsDD999]

my jab at this. or nearby.
Why, oh, why, after implementing such a wonderful feature as area harvesting and planting would you not adjust plant/harvest algorithm? we technically got a 6x time saving feature, best average is x3.765 (j/k, to be more precise its >3 and <4) its just painful to watch my toon do it the stupid way.

Have you seen how broken trellis area-farming was for around 5 years? That change only coincidentally fixed it. Maybe in another 5 years the area-farming for other crops will be fixed on accident.

[telum12]

Did devs really add LP/H as lp per in game hour? They must be truly retarded.

At first I was like oh cool, so now I know how much lp I would gain per hour, but then made me think. Hold up wait a second. The whole LP per hour doesn't do shit, BECUASE YOU DON'T GAIN LP PER HOUR YOU GAIN IT ONCE IT FINISHES STUDYING IT. So what was the point of the LP per hour?
To let you know which is better curio? But it would have some retarded shit that curio that gives you total of 5K and 50 per hour but finishes in 5 days or curio that gives you 1K and 10 lp per hour but finishes in 10 hours. (Yes yes I know the math doesn't add up, it's just an exmaple.).

wtf are you on about, 50 lp/h curio that finishes in 5 days would be 6k LP. A 10 lp/h curio that finishes in 10 hours would be 100 LP. Why wouldn't you study the 50 lp/h one? It's 5x more lp per hour of time inside your study.

Longer curios are also better, because you need less of them and don't have to refill study desk as often...

[Nightdawg]

wtf are you on about, 50 lp/h curio that finishes in 5 days would be 6k LP. A 10 lp/h curio that finishes in 10 hours would be 100 LP. Why wouldn't you study the 50 lp/h one? It's 5x more lp per hour of time inside your study.

Longer curios are also better, because you need less of them and don't have to refill study desk as often...

[WowGain]

Are you surprised?
Did you forget the *horisontal* waterskin indicators, *barely visible* gridlines, the custom-client-like minimap that doesn't actually work like the custom client minimaps, whatever *stupid ctrl+alt+shift combination* they added to the vanilla client that's literally some dumber version of the custom client hotkeys that works in a very weird way?

If anything, it's only fascinating how they figure out a way to take something from every custom client and just make it worse, when the perfect model is just... THERE.

custom client implementations arent even the best that they probably could be, so its just fascinating when the devs somehow aim lower instead of trying to aim higher on the implementation of a feature from clients