by LadyV » Fri Apr 01, 2016 6:04 am Granger wrote:LadyV wrote:I prefer naming keys what i will. I prefer the current system.
Noone wants to remove renaming of keys, only that a copy (master or slave) inherits the name of the master has when created (instead of 'master|slave key').
In that case i don't mind. As logn as it can be named what i want.
