jorb wrote:Granger wrote:Ideally a game should not induce RSI but limit the interaction to actual decisions
Deciding to play the game should be enough.
Your argument is bullshit and you know it.
jorb wrote:Granger wrote:Ideally a game should not induce RSI but limit the interaction to actual decisions
Deciding to play the game should be enough.
Granger wrote:Fuck off, please go grow yourself some decency.
jorb wrote:Granger wrote:Ideally a game should not induce RSI but limit the interaction to actual decisions
Deciding to play the game should be enough.
jorb wrote:?
Indeed: Ideally the game should play itself.
jorb wrote:I agree that there is a lot of nonsense that could be automated. Point perhaps being that it's not as if it's just a question of decision points. A meaningful decision to a small fish is not meaningful to a big one.
Zentetsuken wrote:jorb wrote:I agree that there is a lot of nonsense that could be automated. Point perhaps being that it's not as if it's just a question of decision points. A meaningful decision to a small fish is not meaningful to a big one.
go home jorb, you're drunk
Users browsing this forum: Ardennesss, Claude [Bot], Trendiction [Bot] and 46 guests