its all the bad argumentation that i dont like. if someone had an argument like, "no this is terrible because it can be exploited to do such and such" i'd be glad to see that flaw pointed out.
and im more depressed than pissed right now.
Luanes wrote:Well, it's okay if it would be like a shit curio, like wish bone. Otherwise it could be exploited by repeatedly planting low quality trees.
Luanes wrote:I read the post, and 1% is not "low". 1:10000 would be a decent ratio for a good curio, but 1:100? I plant 20 trees everyday.
synaris wrote:Luanes wrote:I read the post, and 1% is not "low". 1:10000 would be a decent ratio for a good curio, but 1:100? I plant 20 trees everyday.
so you plant 20 trees every day. do you immediately chop em down? most people who plant trees want the high quality wood they provide, rather than gambling on a curio.
and we could drop the ratio for bushes. say 1/500.
synaris wrote:and so what if 20 mature at a time? you couldnt get a stick of truth from a mature tree.
Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot], Claude [Bot] and 69 guests