vatas wrote:neeco wrote:Or just bump it to 32 for 4 cupboards even. Minor change.
Would be comparable to ore stockpiles having been changed from 70 to 75 for 3 smelters even.
Ardennesss wrote:Typical Jorb response.
Player makes logical argument, developer ignores. Asking to put an extra 10 boards into a stockpile is definitely crossing a line, and frankly we should ban the OP of this post for suggesting such a heinous thing.
neeco wrote:Or just bump it to 32 for 4 cupboards even. Minor change.
Ardennesss wrote:neeco wrote:Or just bump it to 32 for 4 cupboards even. Minor change.
wonder-ass wrote:32 my ocd would cry everytime i saw that number. pls no.
jorb wrote:The running server is the test server.
jorb wrote:thingsArdennesss wrote:Typical Jorb response.
CTheRain wrote:Why not infinite stockpiles? Would cut down on space management and we'd still need to sort quality.
Ardennesss wrote:Bots, mostly. "Building Quality" resources would no longer be any sort of constraint. Need to build a great hall? Sweet, we've got 50000 boards stockpiled and 100000 blocks already and 200000 stone, no worries. Infinite stockpiles would definitely be a step in the wrong direction.
jorb wrote:The running server is the test server.
Users browsing this forum: Claude [Bot] and 3 guests