Please make a survey about features you add

[jorb]

Posting surveys asking permission before changing any detail about the game is not a good use of time. The things that will bother you are often the ones no one thought to ask about anyway.

We want to fix the inconsistent time scales the game presents, but it is largely a separate issue from presenting an LP/h value on curios.

my jab at this. or nearby.
Why, oh, why, after implementing such a wonderful feature as area harvesting and planting would you not adjust plant/harvest algorithm? we technically got a 6x time saving feature, best average is x3.765 (j/k, to be more precise its >3 and <4) its just painful to watch my toon do it the stupid way.

Because it was a quick fix, and not a desire to implement a solution to a travelling salesman problem.

[shubla]

I tried planting a field and its pretty horrendous pattern indeed.

Because it was a quick fix, and not a desire to implement a solution to a travelling salesman problem.

Yes the same reason why police should not do their work because there is no way to stop 100% criminals anyway.
Same reason why all doctors should be fired because you cannot save everybody anyway.
Same reason why chess should not be played because no player will ever truly master it or make the optimal moves.

You don't have to come up with the optimal solution, even just some simple pattern would suffice.
The most common case is rectangular field anyway so its very very easy subset of this problem anyways.

[Dimlight25]

Do the thing OldSchool Rusecape does with it's community and do polls for everything, OSRS has skyrocketed since the polls were introduced.

[vatas]

Because it was a quick fix, and not a desire to implement a solution to a travelling salesman problem.

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/ ... Xorc9X.mp4

Can't even walk straight in what should be the simplest scenario.

[DDDsDD999]

Because it was a quick fix, and not a desire to implement a solution to a travelling salesman problem.

Can't even walk straight in what should be the simplest scenario.

Someone get the old trellis farming one too

---

On topic, polls for everything is bad, just expect things to be implemented not goodly very often. Though I think a forum thread every once in a while like "which project would you like to see?" could be good. All the changes I want are fixing existing things.

[SnuggleSnail]

All the changes I want are fixing existing things.

[Massa]

Did devs really add LP/H as lp per in game hour? They must be truly retarded.

Are you surprised?
Did you forget the *horisontal* waterskin indicators, *barely visible* gridlines, the custom-client-like minimap that doesn't actually work like the custom client minimaps, whatever *stupid ctrl+alt+shift combination* they added to the vanilla client that's literally some dumber version of the custom client hotkeys that works in a very weird way?

If anything, it's only fascinating how they figure out a way to take something from every custom client and just make it worse, when the perfect model is just... THERE.

lp/hr is the only stat number that matters

ass to grass petal to fucking metal buddy

[shubla]

Did devs really add LP/H as lp per in game hour? They must be truly retarded.

On second thought, maybe its not so bad. After all you mostly use them for relative comparison anyway, as you may have modifiers such as sub that affect your total gain. (Maybe display your LP gain somewhere and reasons for it)

What is bad though is that everybody has used RL hours for so long time so you couldn't compare them to wiki etc.