burgingham wrote:Well I guess I might be biased from the big city life. There are always fires burning somewhere to light your torch on.
That's not the problem as such, the site in question is far quieter.
burgingham wrote:Well I guess I might be biased from the big city life. There are always fires burning somewhere to light your torch on.
loftar wrote:Well, I think it is at least fair to say that if one wants to "fix" the firebrand, the proper solution is to add more advanced fire-starter devices, rather than to make the firebrand itself more lenient.
molenga wrote:loftar wrote:Well, I think it is at least fair to say that if one wants to "fix" the firebrand, the proper solution is to add more advanced fire-starter devices, rather than to make the firebrand itself more lenient.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bow_drill
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fire_piston
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tinderbox
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fire_striker
Such as these?
burgingham wrote:Well I guess I might be biased from the big city life. There are always fires burning somewhere to light your torch on.
shubla wrote:molenga wrote:loftar wrote:Well, I think it is at least fair to say that if one wants to "fix" the firebrand, the proper solution is to add more advanced fire-starter devices, rather than to make the firebrand itself more lenient.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bow_drill
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fire_piston
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tinderbox
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fire_striker
Such as these?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flamethrower
Yea
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Claude [Bot] and 3 guests