Low tier rings
27 posts
• Page 3 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
Re: Low tier rings
by Zeler » Tue Jul 19, 2016 5:52 pm
The point is - in my oppinion - jewelery slots, and to be precise rings, should be reserved for "rare" stuff. I think it is a lot more rewarding to finally fill up a empty slot than upgrade already existing item.
-
Zeler - Posts: 1484
- Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 2:09 pm
Re: Low tier rings
by Hasta » Tue Jul 19, 2016 6:51 pm
Zeler wrote:it is a lot more rewarding to finally fill up a empty slot than upgrade already existing item.
Can't argue with that; but then again, we do have at least several upgrade tiers for most of item slots, even with the current scarce selection of gear. I understand that "having rings" is basically a binary since legacy times, when you are either developed enough to have rings or not. That is the paradigm I was talking about shifting, and I see your arguments now.
@Ysh and Burinn: regarding the value, yes, valid point; but in that sense it's a good thing for game. Makes characters' developement curve more smooth.
-
Hasta - Posts: 1937
- Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2014 3:27 pm
Re: Low tier rings
by tyrtix » Tue Jul 19, 2016 7:01 pm
from some comments, it seems that proposing something that MAY have an effect on older players is bad, because they MAY loose something... well, this speaks for itself and for many problems of this game ![¦]](./images/smilies/troll.gif "Trollface")
-
tyrtix - Posts: 1102
- Joined: Wed Feb 19, 2014 12:54 am
- Location: Leghorn
Re: Low tier rings
by Ysh » Tue Jul 19, 2016 7:23 pm
tyrtix wrote:from some comments, it seems that proposing something that MAY have an effect on older players is bad, because they MAY loose something... well, this speaks for itself and for many problems of this game
Just to clarify my position, I do not say this is bad. I just say that it is not without drawback for some player.
Kaios wrote:Spice Girls are integral to understanding Ysh's thought process when communicating, duly noted.
I have become victory of very nice Jordan Coles Contest! Enjoy my winning submit here if it pleasures you.
-
Ysh - Posts: 5953
- Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2010 4:43 am
- Location: Chatting some friends on forum
Re: Low tier rings
by tyrtix » Tue Jul 19, 2016 7:50 pm
Ysh wrote:tyrtix wrote:from some comments, it seems that proposing something that MAY have an effect on older players is bad, because they MAY loose something... well, this speaks for itself and for many problems of this game
Just to clarify my position, I do not say this is bad. I just say that it is not without drawback for some player.
And that's good. In fact, for noobs that do not understand how much good could be having even a low ql, higher tier ring, this kind of change could also lead to an increase in demand for those high tiered...it's hard to really find if a change like that could be or not a drawback.
-
tyrtix - Posts: 1102
- Joined: Wed Feb 19, 2014 12:54 am
- Location: Leghorn
Re: Low tier rings
by GenghisKhan44 » Sat Dec 10, 2016 10:51 pm
Why not oak rings? Probably just for show. Or as a gilding.
"...the dungeon and shackles are already at my threshold to show me here and now my eternal disgrace. Only you can work the miracle to make life possible for a soul so imperiled by doubt, O Atoner for all, exalted beyond saying." - St. Gregory of Narek, Book of Lamentations, Prayer 1.
You are much loved! Love in return!
You are much loved! Love in return!
-
GenghisKhan44 - Posts: 969
- Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2012 4:56 pm
Re: Low tier rings
by jorb » Mon Jan 02, 2017 1:48 pm
Simple jewelry would be nice.
"The psychological trials of dwellers in the last times will be equal to the physical trials of the martyrs. In order to face these trials we must be living in a different world."
-- Hieromonk Seraphim Rose
-- Hieromonk Seraphim Rose
-
jorb - Posts: 18437
- Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2009 7:07 am
- Location: Here, there and everywhere.
27 posts
• Page 3 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Claude [Bot] and 84 guests
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group